Family-based visa
Green card category for preference relatives of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs), governed by INA § 203(a). Distinct from immediate relative categories (CR-1, IR-1, K-1).
Complete Family Based visa guide: requirements, costs, timelines, and the step-by-step path of your journey to United States.
Take the test and find out whether you qualify, or exactly what you need to do to qualify.
Save up to 12 hours in meetings
No pointless assessments.
Save up to 90%
Save money on vague or unfocused consultations
Avoid Fraud and Mistakes
One mistake can cost you your visa
Total Impartiality
Zero commercial bias
Decide with peace of mind
No toxic urgency
Fast and Accurate
Answers in minutes, no guesswork
Eligibility criteria
Get to know the main criteria evaluated by USCIS before starting your petition.
Green card category for preference relatives of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs), governed by INA § 203(a). Distinct from immediate relative categories (CR-1, IR-1, K-1).
Initiated by the U.S. relative (citizen or LPR) with Form I-130 (Petition for Alien Relative), accompanied by proof of relationship: birth, marriage, adoption, or other civil records.
Each category has its own queue with wait times from a few months to decades, controlled monthly by the Department of State in the Visa Bulletin (Final Action Dates and Dates for Filing).
F1: unmarried adult sons/daughters of citizens. F2A: spouse and minor children of LPRs. F2B: unmarried adult children of LPRs. F3: married children of citizens. F4: siblings of citizens.
Total ~226,000 visas/year, with a 7% per-country limit. Mexico, Philippines, China, and India face significantly longer queues due to historic accumulated demand.
The Child Status Protection Act preserves eligibility of children who turn 21 during the queue — the CSPA Age calculation is decisive, and timing errors can cost the entire category.
A complete mini-course on the five preference categories (F1, F2A, F2B, F3, F4), I-130, the Visa Bulletin, CSPA, and the years of waiting that separate a petition from the green card. Five chapters, zero guesswork.
The family-based system is the historical pillar of U.S. immigration. It has two completely different paths — Immediate Relative (no waiting line) and Family Preference (a multi-year line). Confusing the two is the most expensive mistake in the process.
The family-based system, governed by INA § 201 and § 203(a), allows U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs) to sponsor family members for the green card. There are two macro categories with opposing logic: Immediate Relative (IR), with no numerical cap, and Family Preference, with annual quotas and a line ordered by priority date.
The Immediate Relative category covers spouses (CR-1/IR-1), unmarried children under 21 (IR-2/CR-2), and parents (IR-5) of U.S. Citizens. It is processed at the administrative speed of USCIS and the consulate — typically 12 to 24 months from filing to green card delivery. There is no real “line”: once documents and the interview are approved, the visa is issued.
The Family Preference category (the focus of this playbook) has five subcategories — F1, F2A, F2B, F3, and F4 — covering relatives of citizens and permanent residents who do NOT qualify for IR. Each one has a fixed annual quota, a date-ordered priority queue, and waiting times that range from months to decades. Brazil, as a country of chargeability, has priority dates close to those of “World” (excluding China/India/Mexico/the Philippines), but still faces real waits — F4 (siblings), for example, has been operating with more than 16 years of backlog.
The practical difference between IR and Family Preference is dramatic: someone who marries a U.S. Citizen today may have a green card in 12-18 months; meanwhile, a sibling of a U.S. Citizen who joins the line today will see the green card arrive close to 2042. Diagnosing the correct category at the outset is the most important step of any family-based strategy.
Immediate Relative is not Family Preference. IR has no waiting line — Family Preference has lines of years to decades. Confusing the two leads to wrong expectations, wrong financial planning, and, in some cases, a lost aging-out (CSPA) opportunity.
Not every relative can be sponsored, and not every American can sponsor. The rules about who may petition and for whom define case viability before any document is filled out.
Only two figures may petition relatives for a green card: U.S. Citizens (born or naturalized) and Lawful Permanent Residents (green card holders). Each has a different reach. U.S. Citizens may sponsor a spouse, children (any age, married or not), parents (if the citizen is 21+), and siblings (if the citizen is 21+). Permanent Residents may sponsor only a spouse and unmarried children — they cannot sponsor parents, siblings, or married children.
This distinction is fundamental: many cases start with a permanent resident sponsoring a minor child (F2A) and, before the priority date becomes current, the petitioner naturalizes as a citizen. Naturalization automatically upgrades the case from F2A to IR-2 (no quota) — accelerating it dramatically. Timing strategies between naturalization and the family petition are an advanced technical layer that saves years of waiting.
On qualifying ties: spouse includes legitimate marriages (not fraudulent for immigration purposes — under rigorous scrutiny), including same-sex marriages recognized by the jurisdiction where they were celebrated (post-Obergefell). Child includes biological, adoptive (with adoption completed before age 16 in most cases), stepchild (if the parents’ marriage took place before the stepchild turned 18), and child born out of wedlock (with specific evidentiary requirements). Sibling requires a common biological parent. Parent includes biological father, adoptive father (formalized before the child turned 16), and stepparent (under certain conditions).
Important: ties created by a temporary visa (B-1, F-1, H-1B, etc.) do not generate the right to a family-based petition. Only the petitioner’s status (citizen or LPR) and the qualifying legal family relationship define eligibility.
Naturalizing during a pending F2A upgrades the category to IR-2 (no quota), cutting years of wait. The timing between N-400 and the priority date becoming current can be decisive — in some cases, waiting for naturalization is worth months; in others, it is not.
F1 covers unmarried sons and daughters over 21 of U.S. Citizens. F2A covers spouses and children under 21 of permanent residents. They are high-volume categories that face very different Visa Bulletin dynamics.
F1 (First Preference): unmarried sons and daughters over 21 of U.S. Citizens. Annual quota: 23,400 visas (plus any leftover from EB-4). For Brazil (without per-country cap exceedance), the F1 line has historically operated between 6 and 10 years of wait. F1 is the category that absorbs children who aged out of IR-2 — those who entered as a minor under 21 and turned 21 before the green card was issued become F1 (unless CSPA preserves the original category).
F2A (Second Preference, sub-A): spouses and unmarried children under 21 of Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs/green card holders). Annual quota: 87,934 visas (77% of F2). F2A is the most “fluid” category in the system — at multiple points in the cycle (2020-2022 and 2024-2025) it became current, meaning no waiting line. When current, processing is essentially IR-paced — months, not years. F2A is where most of the immigration of spouses of Brazilians and other newly minted LPRs lives.
Chart A vs. Chart B in the Visa Bulletin: the Visa Bulletin publishes two tables monthly — Final Action Dates (Chart A, when a case can be concluded) and Dates for Filing (Chart B, when NVC can accept documents). USCIS chooses, month by month, which chart to use for AOS. F2A frequently uses Chart B (the more favorable one) for AOS, allowing the beneficiary to obtain a work permit (EAD) and travel permission (Advance Parole) years before the green card itself is delivered.
Derivative beneficiary: in F2A, if the principal beneficiary is the spouse, the spouse’s unmarried minor children automatically come along as derivative beneficiaries (same priority date, same category). No separate I-130 is needed for each child — a single petition covers the spouse and children under 21. This changes in IR and F2B (no derivatives).
F2A current means immediate filing — no multi-year line. During current periods (which alternate with retrogression), the entire backlog is processed and new cases move at the pace of the consulate/USCIS. Monitoring the Visa Bulletin monthly is mandatory for F2A.
F2B covers unmarried adult sons and daughters (21+) of permanent residents. F3 covers married sons and daughters of U.S. Citizens. Both have long lines and counterintuitive strategic dynamics.
F2B (Second Preference, sub-B): unmarried sons and daughters over 21 of Lawful Permanent Residents. Annual quota: 26,266 visas (23% of F2). The F2B line has historically operated between 6 and 10 years for Brazil. Important detail: to remain eligible, the beneficiary must stay UNMARRIED until the green card — getting married during the wait immediately disqualifies F2B (and the case collapses, because an LPR cannot sponsor a married child, and shifting to F3 requires the petitioner to be a citizen).
F3 (Third Preference): married sons and daughters of U.S. Citizens (any age). Annual quota: 23,400 visas. F3 has a long line, historically 11 to 14 years for Brazil. The category is “broad” — it includes the married child, the child’s spouse, and unmarried grandchildren under 21 (all as derivative beneficiaries with the same priority date). A single I-130 can bring 4 or 5 people.
Aging-out in F2B: unlike IR-2, F2B is already in the adult range — there is no aging-out here. But upon naturalization, the petitioner converts F2B into F1, which may have a different line. In some periods, F1 has been faster than F2B; in others, the opposite. CSPA allows an “opt-out” — the beneficiary can request to REMAIN in F2B when the petitioner naturalizes, if F2B has a more favorable priority date than F1 at that moment.
F3 and the flexibility around marriage: unlike the others, F3 is the only category that ACCEPTS married children — all the others require remaining unmarried. So in long-range family planning, getting married while an LPR parent is the petitioner (F2B) is catastrophic, but getting married while the parent is a citizen (F1 → F3) “merely” shifts the category, without destroying the case. The petitioner’s status carries enormous weight.
In F2B, getting married during the line DESTROYS the case. An LPR cannot sponsor a married child — there is no "downgrade" or "category transfer." The beneficiary would have to wait for the petitioner to naturalize and reactivate as F3 (which has its own, usually longer, line).
F4 is the category for siblings of U.S. Citizens. It is the longest line in the family-based system — for some nationalities it operates with 20+ years of wait. F4 strategy is, in practice, generational planning.
F4 (Fourth Preference): brothers and sisters of U.S. Citizens aged 21 or older. Annual quota: 65,000 visas (plus leftovers from F1, F2, and F3). It is the largest numerical quota in family-based, but also the largest accumulated historical demand — producing the longest line in the system.
For Brazil, F4 is currently operating with priority dates in the 2008-2010 range — meaning cases filed 16+ years ago are reaching the front of the line now. For Mexico, the Philippines, and India, the wait can exceed 23 years at certain moments. F4 is literally generational planning: the U.S. Citizen petitioner should file while the sibling is 25-30 so that the green card arrives before age 50.
Qualifying tie: F4 requires a common biological parent (full siblings or half siblings), siblings by adoption (with adoption formalized before the adopted child turned 16), and step-siblings under specific circumstances (parents’ marriage before the stepchildren turned 18). Required evidence: birth certificates of both siblings showing the common parent, marriage certificate of the parents (when applicable), adoption decrees, and DNA tests in cases with inconsistent documentation.
Derivative beneficiaries in F4: the I-130 for the sibling also covers the sibling’s spouse and the sibling’s unmarried children under 21. In some cases this allows an entire family (sibling, sister/brother-in-law, nieces and nephews) to immigrate at the same time. But given the length of the line, nieces and nephews often cross 21 before the green card arrives — requiring careful CSPA analysis.
Long-term strategy: F4 is rarely the “first option” for someone who needs to immigrate urgently. It is a planning category — file now, wait out the line, and in the meantime pursue parallel strategies (F-1 student, H-1B work visa, EB-2/3 through employment, asylum if applicable). F4 often serves as a “guaranteed Plan B” for when other strategies fail — the preserved priority date is a durable asset.
F4 for Brazil today means waiting roughly 16 years from filing to green card delivery. Anyone who files for a 30-year-old sibling will see the green card arrive when the sibling is 46. F4 planning is generational — it is not a solution for an immediate immigration need.
The I-130 is the document that begins the entire family-based journey. A correct filing, with complete evidence, determines whether the priority date will be captured in weeks or whether you will face an RFE months later.
The Form I-130 (Petition for Alien Relative) is the family petition governed by INA § 204 and 8 CFR § 204.2. It is filed by the U.S. relative (citizen or LPR) on behalf of the foreign beneficiary. Filing establishes the priority date — the position in the family-based line — and starts adjudication at USCIS.
Filing fee (2026): US$ 675 paper / US$ 625 online. The biometrics fee is not applicable to a standalone I-130; biometrics is for AOS. Payment via credit card (online), money order, or check (paper). USCIS rejects filings with the wrong fee — check the current fee schedule at uscis.gov before submitting.
Essential evidence: (1) proof of the petitioner’s status (U.S. passport, certificate of naturalization, or green card); (2) proof of the family tie — birth certificate (children, siblings), marriage certificate (spouse), adoption decree, divorce decree from any prior relationships if applicable; (3) certified translations of any document not in English; (4) passport-style photo of the beneficiary; (5) Form G-325A if applicable (some variants require it). For spouse cases, additional evidence proves bona fide marriage: wedding photos, joint accounts, joint lease, joint tax returns, family declarations.
Priority date: the date on which USCIS receives the I-130 (not when it approves). Captured immediately — even if the petition is later denied and refiled, the original priority date is preserved in some cases (under INA § 204(j)). For nationalities with retrogression, capturing the priority date 1 month earlier can mean 1 less year in line.
Adjudication time: USCIS currently takes 12-24 months to approve an I-130 (varies by service center). Spouse of a U.S. Citizen (IR-1/CR-1) gets administrative priority and is generally faster. For Family Preference, fast approval does not accelerate the line — but it avoids problems with petitioner status renewal and expiring documentation.
I-130 online is US$ 50 cheaper and provides immediate confirmation of receipt (priority date captured). Paper filing has a 2-3 week delay until the receipt notice. For urgent cases or those near monthly Visa Bulletin retrogression, online is the strategic choice.
The Affidavit of Support is the contract by which the petitioner financially guarantees the beneficiary. Without a valid I-864, the case does not move forward — and insufficient income is one of the largest causes of denial in family-based cases.
The Form I-864 (Affidavit of Support), governed by INA § 213A and 8 CFR § 213a, is a binding legal obligation: the petitioner (sponsor) guarantees that the beneficiary will not become a “public charge” — that is, will not depend on government assistance for subsistence. Without an approved I-864, the consulate/USCIS will NOT issue the green card.
Income threshold: 125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for the size of the household (petitioner + dependents + beneficiary). In 2026, for a family of 2: approximately US$ 25,550/year. For a family of 4: US$ 38,875. Active duty members of the U.S. armed forces sponsoring a spouse or child: 100% of the guidelines. The petitioner must prove that income via tax returns (3 years), W-2s, recent paystubs (6 months), and an employment verification letter.
Joint sponsor: if the petitioner does not meet the threshold, a joint sponsor (any U.S. Citizen or LPR adult resident in the U.S., with no family tie required) can supplement. The joint sponsor assumes joint and several financial responsibility — they can be sued in civil court if the beneficiary receives public benefits. Important decision: friends and family must understand the risk before signing an I-864.
Assets in lieu of income: if the petitioner has insufficient income but holds liquid assets (savings, investments, real estate minus mortgage), they can use 5x the gap (3x for spouse or child of a citizen). Example: US$ 10,000 income gap — requires US$ 50,000 in documented liquid assets.
Validity: the I-864 binds the sponsor until the beneficiary (1) naturalizes, (2) works 40 qualified Social Security quarters (~10 years), (3) permanently leaves the U.S., or (4) dies. Divorce does NOT terminate the I-864 — the sponsor remains bound even after separation. This is a critical point in IR-1 cases: a U.S. Citizen spouse who divorces remains financially responsible for the immigrant spouse.
The I-864 is a contract with the U.S. government, NOT an administrative document. A sponsor who cannot continuously document income, or whose beneficiary receives public benefits eligible for recoupment, may be sued by the government or by the beneficiary themselves. Divorce does NOT end the obligation.
The Visa Bulletin is the official "ruler" of family-based. Knowing how to read it, anticipate movements, and plan strategic reactions is what separates well-managed cases from cases stalled for months.
The Visa Bulletin, published monthly by the Department of State at travel.state.gov, defines, month by month, which priority dates can move forward to the green card. It has two tables for family-based: Chart A — Final Action Dates and Chart B — Dates for Filing.
Chart A (Final Action Dates): the cut-off date that can receive an approved green card that month. If your priority date is ON OR BEFORE Chart A, your case can be approved. If after, wait.
Chart B (Dates for Filing): the date through which NVC or USCIS will accept documents for processing, but WITHOUT issuing the green card yet. It allows “queue stocking” — the beneficiary submits I-485 or DS-260 while awaiting Chart A. For AOS (adjustment within the U.S.), USCIS chooses MONTHLY which chart to use (announced at uscis.gov). For consular processing, DOS always uses Chart A for final issuance, but uses Chart B to accept documents at NVC.
Reading example: “F1 World — 01OCT15” means: for F1, “World” beneficiaries (not Mexico/Philippines/India/China) with priority date through October 1, 2015 may receive a green card this month. If your I-130 was filed on 15OCT15, wait — the next month’s update may release.
Typical movements: priority dates advance, hold, or roll back (retrogression). Advances of 1-2 months per month are typical when a category is healthy. Retrogression occurs when demand exceeds supply — the October bulletin may show 01OCT15 and the November bulletin may show 15SEP14 (rolled back 1 year). Categories may go “Unavailable” (U) in critical months — no one receives a visa that month for that category.
“Current” (C): a category is “current” when there is NO cut-off — any priority date is eligible. F2A often alternates between current and a months-long cut-off. IR is always current (no quota).
The Visa Bulletin is published between the 8th and 15th of each month for the following month. Track travel.state.gov monthly — missing a month in which your category advanced or became current can delay AOS by months, especially for F2A and fast-moving categories.
CSPA is one of the most technical and most important pieces of family-based. The CSPA formula decides whether a child or grandchild who turns 21 during the line remains eligible or loses the category.
The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), enacted in 2002 (Pub. L. 107-208), was created to solve the aging-out problem — children who entered as under 21 and turned 21 before the green card was issued, being automatically disqualified.
The CSPA formula: CSPA age = beneficiary’s age when the priority date becomes current MINUS the time the I-130 was pending at USCIS. If the result is below 21, the child keeps “child” status even if their actual age is 21+.
Example: a 19-year-old child when the I-130 is filed. The I-130 is pending at USCIS for 4 years. The priority date becomes current when the child is 25 (21 + 4 years waiting after approval). CSPA Age = 25 – 4 = 21. Result: 21 IS NOT below 21 — the child loses eligibility. Small detail: the calculation is performed on the EXACT day the priority date becomes current; rounding matters.
“Sought to acquire” requirement: beyond the numerical formula, the beneficiary must “seek to acquire” immigrant status within 1 year of visa availability. “Seek to acquire” means filing I-485 (AOS) or paying the NVC fee + DS-260 (consular processing) within that window. Without this action, CSPA does not preserve the age.
Application by category: CSPA applies to IR-2/CR-2 (children of citizens), F1, F2A (children), F2B (children), F3 (derivative children), F4 (derivative children/nephews and nieces). The calculation is the same for each, but the line is different — F4 often has a line so long that even CSPA does not save young nephews and nieces.
Regulatory changes 2023-2026: in February 2023, USCIS updated the CSPA Memorandum: for AOS (I-485) based on Chart B (Dates for Filing), the formula uses the DATE Chart B becomes favorable, NOT Chart A (Final Action Date). The change benefits thousands of cases — beneficiaries who were losing age while waiting for Chart A now “freeze” their age when Chart B opens.
For AOS, since February 2023 USCIS calculates the CSPA Age based on Chart B (Dates for Filing) where applicable, instead of Chart A. This can reduce the CSPA age by several months — preserving eligibility for children on the verge of aging out.
Family-based concentrates a few recurring errors that cost years or destroy cases. Understanding these patterns is more valuable than memorizing forms.
Error 1: marrying during F2B. The case collapses instantly — an LPR cannot sponsor a married child, and even if the petitioner naturalizes later, the case shifts to F3 (a longer line). Adult Brazilian children with a pending F2B priority date should wait until the green card is delivered before marrying — years of waiting are lost in a single ceremony.
Error 2: leaving an I-130 abandoned after the priority date becomes current. NVC sends a notice (“welcome letter”) when the priority date becomes current. The beneficiary has 1 year to respond — paying fees, submitting DS-260 and Affidavit of Support. Without a response, NVC closes the case and revokes the I-130. Decades of waiting can be lost to inaction. Update the address and email at NVC whenever they change.
Error 3: omitting criminal convictions or inadmissibilities. Family-based requires a clean criminal record (or waivers). Minor convictions (DUI, drug possession, tax fraud) can disqualify — some have waivers (I-601, I-601A for unlawful presence), others do not. Consulting an immigration attorney BEFORE submitting forms is mandatory if there is any record.
Error 4: poorly documented I-864. A sponsor with insufficient income, no planned joint sponsor, no assets calculated — the case stalls at the consulate for months until the I-864 is resubmitted. A willing and qualified joint sponsor must be identified BEFORE the interview.
Error 5: assuming the green card “guarantees” citizenship. A green card holder must maintain physical presence (not staying outside the U.S. for more than 6 months without a reentry permit) and good moral character. Abandonment of residence (residence outside the U.S. for 1+ year without a reentry permit) cancels the green card. For naturalization: 5 years of continuous LPR (3 if married to a citizen), basic English, civics test, and absence of serious convictions.
Error 6: marriage fraud. Marrying an American solely for a green card (sham marriage) is criminal fraud — INA § 275(c) provides for 5 years in prison and a US$ 250k fine. Investigations are frequent (separate Stokes interview, residence visits). Genuine marriages with sparse documentation can be mistaken for fraudulent — hence the emphasis on extensive bona fide marriage evidence.
Family-based tolerates bureaucratic delays but does NOT tolerate strategic errors. Marrying at the wrong time, missing the CSPA window, ignoring the NVC welcome letter, or submitting an incomplete I-864 destroys years of waiting. Specialized counsel before critical filings is an investment, not a cost.
Family-based is rarely a standalone strategy. Combining the I-130 (preserving the priority date) with employment-based, study, or the diversity visa multiplies chances and reduces total time.
Family-based is the “guaranteed path” — once the I-130 is approved, the priority date is preserved even if the case waits in line for decades. But given the long lines (especially F1, F3, F4), combining with other paths is the standard strategy for serious professionals.
Strategy 1 — Family-based + Employment-based: a beneficiary with a pending F4 I-130 (16-year line) also pursues U.S. employment via H-1B → EB-2/EB-3. If H-1B + EB-2 produces a green card in 5 years, great — the I-130 stays as backup. If employment-based fails, F4 keeps moving. Important: I-130 and I-140 priority dates are separate and do not combine — each path has its own line.
Strategy 2 — Family-based + Study (F-1): an adult child with a pending F2B goes to study in the U.S. on an F-1 while waiting. It covers legal stay, enables transition to H-1B via OPT/STEM OPT, and keeps F2B alive. Caveat: F-1 requires nonimmigrant intent — declaring a pending I-130 in a consular interview can lead to denial (the consul may doubt the nonimmigrant intent). Typical playbooks: filing F-1 BEFORE the I-130, or using 245(k) for direct AOS.
Strategy 3 — Family-based + Diversity Visa: Brazil is eligible for the Diversity Visa Lottery. Annual registration is free, with no real cost. If selected, green card in 6-12 months. F4 stays as backup. For F4 with 15+ years in line, playing the DV Lottery every year is a rational decision.
Strategy 4 — K-3 visa to accelerate IR-1: spouses of U.S. Citizens with a pending I-130 may use K-3 (special spouse visa) to enter the U.S. while waiting for IR-1. K-3 is virtually extinct in practice (USCIS often approves the I-130 before the K-3 in adjudication) but remains a formal option.
Strategy 5 — Maintaining legal status during a Family Preference line: a beneficiary with a pending I-130 (especially F1, F2B, F3, F4) who is in the U.S. on a nonimmigrant visa must maintain legal status continuously. Lapses lead to unlawful presence, which triggers 3- or 10-year bars under INA § 212(a)(9)(B). For many, this means H-1B → L-1 → O-1 → another nonimmigrant in sequence, or returning to the home country and waiting through consular processing.
Family-based is not "exclusive" of other paths. File the I-130 even without certainty of future use — a preserved priority date is an asset worth years. Combine with employment-based, study, and diversity visa in parallel. The category that delivers first wins.
Frequently asked questions
Straight answers related to this visa.
No FAQs are linked to this visa yet. Tag FAQs with the visa taxonomy in WordPress.
Success stories
Real stories from people who went through the process.
No testimonials are linked to this visa yet. Publish testimonials with the visa taxonomy in WordPress.
Latest posts
Coverage and updates related to this visa.
Step-by-step guide to the marriage-based green card in the U.S.: eligibility, I-130 and I-485 petitions, the interview, conditional residence, and…
New State Department guideline treats chronic diseases such as diabetes and obesity as public charge indicators in visa and green…
Understand what a Request for Evidence is, why USCIS issues this notice, and how to prepare an effective response to…
Living Abroad
A practical breakdown of EB-1 through EB-5 categories, family-based green cards, how USCIS works, reading the Visa Bulletin, updated 2026…
The US has restricted the entry of citizens from 39 countries since January 2026. Find out who is affected, the…
USCIS has reduced the validity of the EAD from 5 years to 18 months for adjustment of status applicants, refugees,…
Understand the USCIS policy that reduced EAD validity to 18 months and ended automatic extensions: who is affected and how…
Understand the Visa Bulletin from the Department of State, how the Priority Date works, and how to track your position…
Learn what Advance Parole is, who needs to apply, updated costs, and how the travel document works during adjustment of…
Learn how the K-1 visa works, from the I-129F petition to marriage in the USA, with updated fees and 2026…
Living Abroad
Updated overview of Green Card categories through family, employment, investment, and diversity — with requirements, fees, and processing timelines for…
Adjustment of Status allows you to convert a temporary visa into a green card without leaving the United States. See…
Destinations
Explore popular destinations within this country.