How to respond to an RFE that questions the consistency of Academic Evaluation data?

An RFE (Request for Evidence) that questions the consistency of your academic evaluation is a request for clarification, not a denial of your case. The right response is organized and objective: explain the apparent discrepancies and support each point with documents that confirm the accuracy of your records. In EB-2 NIW petitions, a clear and thorough response is what restores confidence in your academic history.

Start by reviewing the evaluation letter and your original documents side by side to identify exactly what raised the concern. Many apparent inconsistencies have straightforward explanations, such as variations in the translation of degree titles, different course naming conventions across countries, or different versions of the same document.

• Address each discrepancy and explain technically why it does not affect the actual content of your academic record.
• Attach supporting evidence, such as diplomas, transcripts, and a statement from the institution or the evaluation service.
• Describe the methodology used in the evaluation and the criteria adopted by the service you retained.

Keep copies of everything and make sure your response is complete and consistent. Since each RFE is specific, it is important to follow exactly what the USCIS letter requests and, if the case is complex, have a specialist review your response before submitting it.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.