How to respond to an RFE that questions the consistency of Academic Evaluation data?

When you receive an RFE (Request for Evidence) questioning the consistency of your academic evaluation data, it is important to remain calm and approach the response in an organized and detailed manner. Remember that the purpose of this request is to clarify doubts and does not represent an immediate denial of your case.

Clarity in explaining the data and presenting consistent supporting documents can help demonstrate the truthfulness and accuracy of your academic history. First, carefully review the academic evaluation letter and the original documents provided. Make sure all information is correct and that there are no discrepancies between the records presented and the evaluation.

If you identify any discrepancies or a possible explanation for apparent inconsistencies – for example, variations in the translation of degree titles or different versions of the document – include a technical and detailed explanation in your response to the RFE. It is essential to attach complementary documents, such as copies of certificates, transcripts, and if necessary, an official statement from the educational institution or evaluation service certifying the correspondence between the data presented.

In drafting the response, be clear and objective. Explain the process you used to obtain the academic evaluation, mentioning, if relevant, which evaluation service was contracted and highlighting the criteria adopted by that service. If the issue involves subtle differences in nomenclature or document formatting, detail these variations and show how they do not compromise the truthfulness and consistency of your educational history.

This approach demonstrates transparency and commitment to the accuracy of the information presented. It is important to emphasize that strictly following U.S. immigration laws and responding accurately to USCIS requests is essential to avoid future complications. Consider, if necessary, seeking the assistance of professionals or specialized services in immigration case analysis, always carefully avoiding involvement with promises of guaranteed results or dubious marketing approaches.

Finally, keep all documents organized, save copies, and ensure your response is complete and coherent. This diligence can make all the difference in the progress of your EB-2 NIW visa petition.

These guidelines aim to help you structure a response that evidences your commitment to the integrity of the data presented and complies with the requirements of the U.S. immigration process.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.