An RFE questioning the consistency of your Academic Evaluation is typically a request for clarification, not a denial. In an EB-2 NIW case, the goal of your response is to reconcile what appears inconsistent and demonstrate that the assessment of your credentials is solid and coherent.
A good approach is to review each piece of evidence before responding and organize your reply around the specific points raised:
- Verify that dates, institution names, and credentials match across all documents.
- Explain the equivalency method used to compare your education with the U.S. educational system.
- Attach supplemental official documentation confirming conclusions, degrees, and credentials.
- Where discrepancies exist, clarify the reason rather than overlooking them.
Draft a letter that addresses each point individually, linking every explanation to the exact passage in the RFE. When appropriate, an expert opinion from a credential evaluation specialist strengthens your credibility.
Because every RFE is specific, respond precisely to what was asked and, if possible, have your response reviewed by a specialist before filing it with USCIS.
Learn more about EB-2 NIW
- Category
- EB-2 NIW Green Card
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- PERM
- Waived
- Processing
- 12-36 months
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.