Does publishing on Arxiv count as a peer-reviewed scientific article?

No. Arxiv is a repository where researchers share manuscripts and preliminary results for rapid access by the scientific community, but it does not apply a formal peer review process. For this reason, publishing on Arxiv does not, on its own, equal having a peer-reviewed article.

This distinction matters in EB-1 cases. When academic merit enters the evaluation, publications that have gone through the critical scrutiny of other specialists (peer review) in recognized journals tend to carry more weight than a manuscript that has only been deposited. That does not mean Arxiv has no value: it shows activity and can provide visibility, but it works better as a complement than as a central piece of evidence.

• A preprint on Arxiv shows that your research is circulating, not that it has been validated by peers.
• Ideally, the same work should later be accepted in a journal with peer review.
• Citations and impact reinforce the overall picture, regardless of where the work first appeared.

Because each case is evaluated individually by the relevant authority, it is worth building a solid body of publications and checking the current requirements through the official source or with a specialist before filing a petition.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.