What are the main elements to include in the response to a NOID related to Academic Evaluation?

Responding to a NOID (Notice of Intent to Deny) related to Academic Evaluation in an EB-2 NIW process requires attention to several elements, both to demonstrate the strength of the arguments and to evidence compliance with the required academic qualification criteria. It is essential to prepare a detailed, organized, and well-founded response, always respecting United States immigration laws.

Below, I present some essential points that should be considered:

1. Clear identification of the contested points: Objectively address the aspects of the academic evaluation that were questioned. Explain how the documents and evidence submitted meet the USCIS requirements, specifying where each point of the evaluation was correctly demonstrated or can be supplemented. This may include evidence of academic degrees, diplomas, certificates, and equivalent evaluations, detailing criteria of academic recognition.

2. Supporting documentation and complementary evidence: Include certified copies of academic documents, such as diplomas, transcripts, and verification letters, as well as qualitative and quantitative evaluations conducted by educational bodies or specialists. If there are expert opinions or evaluation reports that attest to the equivalence and quality of the credentials, it is important to attach them, referencing them in the response to guide the evaluator.

3. Organization and logical argumentation: Structure the response in sections corresponding to the points raised in the NOID. An executive summary, followed by a detailed analysis of each contested item, helps present the information clearly and objectively. Explain how your education aligns with the required criteria and how each included document supports your eligibility for the EB-2 NIW classification.

4. Consultation of reliable sources and adherence to standards: Emphasize the importance of using official documents and evaluations conducted by recognized institutions. Always highlight that it is crucial to follow the guidelines published by USCIS. Seek updated information and avoid relying on marketing campaigns that promise miraculous solutions or definitive results, both regarding the academic evaluation and other process criteria.

5. Caution when reviewing the response: Verify that all documents are translated into English by certified translators, if necessary, and that the response addresses all issues raised in the NOID. This attention to detail demonstrates commitment to compliance and avoids future complications.

Although preparing a complete response requires care and attention to detail, it is always advisable to seek the support of immigration specialists to ensure your response fully complies with the United States requirements and regulations. This way, you minimize risks and potential misunderstandings that may arise during the case review by USCIS.

In summary, when preparing your response to the NOID related to Academic Evaluation, focus on: clearly identifying the contested points; providing supporting documentation and additional evidence; organizing the information logically and coherently; and finally, confirming that all documents and translations meet official requirements. In this manner, you strengthen the solidity of your qualifications, always respecting United States immigration laws and taking care to avoid dubious practices or unfounded promises.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.