In the EB-2 NIW, an Academic Evaluation (degree equivalency assessment) carries more weight when it is clear that it followed a consistent methodology rather than a loose opinion. Demonstrating the rigor behind it strengthens the credibility of your credentials before the reviewing authority.
The starting point is typically a detailed report in which the evaluating institution explains how it reached its conclusions:
- The methodology used to compare your academic background against American academic standards.
- The aspects analyzed, such as coursework hours, course content, and the relevance of your degrees.
- The qualifications of the evaluator, including the use of peer review or other recognized academic methods.
It also helps if the report includes the reasoning behind the analysis, referencing accepted norms and standards, along with a section comparing your degree to equivalent U.S. degrees. This chain of method, analysis, and conclusion is what conveys rigor and allows the evaluation to be verified, not merely accepted on faith.
Since each case is assessed individually, it is worth checking the latest USCIS guidance and reviewing your choice of evaluation service with a specialist before filing.
Learn more about EB-2 NIW
- Category
- EB-2 NIW Green Card
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- PERM
- Waived
- Processing
- 12-36 months
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.