How to respond to an RFE that questions the need for additional investment in your case?

When you receive an RFE (Request for Evidence) that seems to question the need for additional investment in an EB-2 NIW case, the first step is to read the request carefully and understand exactly what the officer is seeking to clarify.

It is important to keep in mind that the EB-2 NIW is not an investment-based immigration pathway and does not require a minimum capital contribution. Unlike the EB-5, the NIW rests on the relevance and national importance of your work, not on the volume of resources invested. Therefore, your response does not need to prove new investments.

The approach is to reinforce that the case is already grounded in merit:

• Show how your work serves the national interest, with qualitative evidence of impact.
• Explain that the resources already involved are sufficient for the project’s objectives, if that is the point raised.
• Connect your accomplishments to concrete benefits for the United States.

Respond directly to what was requested. Since each RFE is specific, it is worth checking the updated USCIS guidance and, when possible, seeking support from a qualified specialist.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.