How to respond to an EB-2 NIW RFE questioning the need for additional investment?

The EB-2 NIW does not require a minimum investment amount. The focus of this category is demonstrating that your work has merit and national importance, not how much money you have invested. A good starting point for your RFE response is making that distinction explicit.

When facing a request that questions the need for additional investment, the right approach is to reinforce the viability of your project with what you already have, rather than committing to new funding:

• Read the RFE carefully and identify exactly what the officer is asking you to clarify.
• Explain how your current resources already support the execution and goals of the project.
• Attach evidence of soundness, such as a work plan, feasibility studies, economic analyses, or support letters from experts.

The core message is that the relevance and viability of your work do not depend on extra funding, but rather on the strategic value of the activity for the United States. Respond in a personalized, point-by-point manner that is organized and well-supported.

Since each RFE is specific and guidance can change, it is worth reviewing the updated instructions on the USCIS website and having a specialist review your response before filing.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.