How do you prove that your Academic Evaluation followed rigorous criteria?

For the EB-2 NIW, the strength of your Academic Evaluation lies not only in its conclusion but in demonstrating how it was conducted. A report that is transparent about its own methodology is what convinces reviewers that the criteria applied were truly rigorous.

In practice, an evaluation report gains credibility when it clearly sets out the elements that support the analysis. It is worth requesting that the report include:

• The equivalency criteria used to compare your credentials against U.S. academic standards.
• The databases, sources, and references consulted during the review of your degrees and certificates.
• The credentials of the evaluating organization, such as accreditations granted by recognized bodies in the field.
• Indications that the evaluation followed standards designed to ensure impartiality and consistency.

Beyond the content of the report, the reputation of the evaluator matters. Prefer an institution or firm that is well recognized and aligned with accepted practices, so that the documentation conveys solidity and transparency.

Each case is reviewed individually, so it is worth checking the latest USCIS guidance and, if possible, reviewing your evidence strategy with a specialist before filing.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.