Is it better to meet the minimum criteria or exceed it in the EB-1?

In the EB-1, what matters is not the number of criteria you check, but the strength and coherence of the evidence you present. Covering more criteria than the minimum can help, but addressing them superficially often counts for less than making a strong case for the ones you truly excel in.

Think quality before quantity. Meeting the required minimum with solid, well-documented evidence can be more convincing than spreading weak proof across many criteria. The review is holistic: the adjudicator looks at the full picture of your career, not just the sum of boxes checked.

• Prioritize the criteria where your evidence is strongest and most verifiable.
• Document each point with depth and context.
• Avoid adding a criterion just to increase the count if you lack real supporting evidence.

The minimum number of criteria and the full list are defined by the competent authority, so it is worth checking the updated requirements directly on the USCIS website and consulting a specialist to determine which combination best highlights your profile.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.