I reviewed 3 articles in a Q2 journal. Is that enough?

It is a good start, but it rarely stands on its own. In the EB-1, reviewing the work of other researchers is a recognized form of evidence because it shows that your field considers you qualified to evaluate your peers’ output. Having served as a reviewer for a journal with a serious editorial process works in your favor.

The key point is that the EB-1 rests on the overall body of evidence, not on a single activity. Peer review carries more weight when it appears alongside other indicators of distinction, for example:

• Your own publications and their reach, such as citations.
• Participation in committees, dissertation panels, or editorial boards.
• Invitations to give talks and relevant presentations.
• Awards, honors, and recognition within your field.

In other words, your experience as a reviewer adds value and helps support the criterion of judging others’ work, but ideally it should be combined with additional evidence demonstrating broader impact and recognition. Because each case is evaluated individually by USCIS, it is worth checking the updated requirements at the official source and building your file with the support of a specialist.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.