Visto n' Visa

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions about EB-1

Straight answers to the most common questions about the EB-1 visa.

My position is ‘executive director’, but I do not have subordinates. Is that a problem?

The EB-1 visa for immigration to the United States requires proof of leadership and significant achievements, not just the job title. Even without direct subordinates, it is possible to qualify if you exercise strategic direction, make high-level decisions, and lead important initiatives in the company. Each case is evaluated individually, considering corporate structure, job nature, and responsibilities. Documentation demonstrating decision-making authority and operational influence is essential. It is recommended to strictly follow immigration laws and seek specialized guidance to avoid unrealistic promises and ensure the proper submission of documents. This text is informative and does not replace personalized legal advice.

Read full answer →

Executive position abroad for 2 years, but the company is sold. Did the new owner maintain my position?

In the context of the EB-1, it is essential to prove continuous performance in an executive role according to USCIS criteria. If the company is sold after your 2 years in the role, maintaining the position depends on the agreements and restructurings implemented by the new management. They may choose to keep your position or change responsibilities, impacting the proof of executive experience. Official documents, internal communications, and formal evidence are fundamental to demonstrate the continuity of the function. It is recommended to be careful in following US immigration rules, seek reliable sources, and specialist guidance. If the position and responsibilities remain compatible with EB-1 requirements, this experience can be used in the immigration process.

Read full answer →

Can they deny because they found my course?

The EB-1 category is intended for individuals with extraordinary achievements, evaluated globally by immigration officers. The analysis is not limited to an isolated course; the focus is on national or international recognition, publications, awards, and associations. Mentioned courses must align with the criteria and demonstrate exceptional development. If the course evidence does not prove extraordinary abilities, it may harm the evaluation but does not cause denial by itself. It is essential that the documentation is consistent and supported by robust evidence. It is recommended to comply with immigration laws and use official information. Questions about qualifications should be consulted with specialists and recognized services to avoid fraud. Each process is unique and evaluated integrally, with fundamental importance given to the transparency and truthfulness of documents to ensure compliance and sustainability in the process.

Read full answer →

My patent was mentioned in reports from competing companies. Is that good?

For EB-1 visa applicants in the United States, presenting evidence that proves the impact and recognition of their achievements is essential. The mention of your patent in reports from competing companies may indicate that your work is recognized in the market and strengthen your file by demonstrating direct relevance in the sector. However, it is imperative to analyze the context of these mentions, verifying whether they are positive, neutral, or critical, as this will influence the perception of immigration officers. Additionally, it is crucial to respect immigration laws and seek guidance from qualified specialists to build a solid case, avoiding unfounded promises and scams. In summary, such mentions can be a positive element in the EB-1 application, provided they are part of a thorough analysis and a robust set of evidence.

Read full answer →

Did I win awards at a festival in the Middle East? Does that count as international?

For EB-1 visas in the USA under the extraordinary ability category, international recognition is fundamental. Awards obtained at festivals abroad, such as in the Middle East, can count if the event and the awards are prestigious and recognized in the industry. USCIS evaluates each case individually, considering the evidence presented. It is crucial to prove prestige through press releases, specialized publications, and statements from experts. Beware of unfounded promises and strictly follow the laws. Consulting immigration specialists is essential to ensure full compliance with requirements and to avoid mistakes in the process.

Read full answer →

I am a sales manager and the company has a branch in the USA. Am I missing 1 year of work?

The EB‑1C category requires qualified experience abroad for at least one year in the three years prior to the petition, obtained in a company related to the US branch. Sales managers with a branch in the USA should wait to complete this period outside American territory, as experience in the USA does not count toward the requirement. Each case is unique, making compliance with formal requirements and maintaining organized documentation essential. Furthermore, attention to current immigration laws and caution with dubious offers is recommended. For specific guidance, consult specialists in the field. This answer is informative and does not replace professional consultation.

Read full answer →

I won a UN contest. Is this award global?

Contests recognized by global institutions, such as the UN, generally have an international character, encompassing varied participants and evaluations based on global standards. In the context of extraordinary ability visas, such as the US EB-1, awards with international recognition reinforce petitions that demonstrate performance at a superior level. However, it is imperative to present clear evidence of the award's importance, including official documentation, selection criteria, and scope. In immigration, strictly following laws is fundamental, and avoiding simplistic promises or unreliable intermediaries is essential as they may compromise the process. Thus, it is advisable to consult specialists and official agencies for a personalized analysis. The UN award tends to have a global character, but gathering corroborative documentation is vital for a robust case in compliance with the legal requirements of the US immigration process.

Read full answer →

Does an online training course I taught with 10,000 enrolled students qualify?

The EB-1 visa requires proof of extraordinary skills and relevant recognition at the national or international level. Although an online course with 10,000 enrolled students demonstrates impact and contribution, this factor alone does not guarantee approval. The applicant must present multiple proofs, such as awards, publications, and peer recognition, demonstrating reach and excellence in the field. Each case is evaluated considering the quality and context of the evidence. It is essential to strictly follow U.S. immigration guidelines, seek updated information, and work with specialists to avoid unfounded promises. This way, you will be prepared for a solid application aligned with the required criteria.

Read full answer →

My name appeared in Forbes, but as part of a list of regional entrepreneurs. Does that count?

The EB‑1 visa is intended for individuals with extraordinary achievements, proven by international awards, high-visibility publications, or global recognition. While mentions in regional lists, such as Forbes, contribute positively, the EB‑1 requires evidence of national or international impact. Regional citations may form part of the body of evidence but generally must be complemented by broader-reaching awards, widely circulated publications, or letters from recognized experts. Each case is assessed individually, making it essential that the dossier robustly and consistently demonstrates extraordinary ability according to legal criteria. It is recommended to strictly adhere to U.S. laws and seek trustworthy guidance to avoid fraud. Thus, the Forbes mention is a favorable element, but the body of evidence must be comprehensive to ensure a solid and compliant EB‑1 process.

Read full answer →

My advisor said that I am top 1%. Is it just him speaking?

The EB-1 visa recognizes extraordinary contributions and skills, requiring documented evidence of outstanding achievement in the field. The 'top 1%' evaluation made by the advisor reflects his opinion based on experience with the candidate, but does not replace official criteria. American authorities consider awards, publications, citations, and patents to prove this position of excellence. It is essential to support the personal assessment with solid documentation to meet the stringent requirements of the process. Moreover, following immigration laws and guidelines is crucial. Consulting reliable sources and renowned experts avoids unfounded expectations, ensuring safety when conducting the immigration process.

Read full answer →

Did I win something like ‘Employee of the Month’. Is it a national award?

The EB-1 visa requires proving high-level achievements such as national or international awards, relevant publications, and participation in prominent associations that demonstrate an extraordinary career. The “Employee of the Month” award is generally an internal company recognition and is not considered a publicly recognized national award, which is a fundamental requirement for the EB-1. Nonetheless, it may contribute to the professional narrative if part of a larger context of exceptional performance, but on its own it hardly meets the demanding criteria. It is essential to strictly comply with U.S. immigration laws, consult reliable sources, and seek specialists to avoid mistakes and ensure a solid application aligned with current regulations.

Read full answer →

Is it crucial to have ‘press articles’ specifically about me?

The EB-1 visa aims to prove extraordinary recognized abilities, and press articles are one way to evidence this but not a mandatory requirement. Although articles can enhance the portfolio, the applicant may present other evidence such as awards, academic publications, participation in international events, and letters of recommendation. Each application is evaluated individually based on the total set of evidence. It is essential to keep up with US immigration laws and seek reliable specialized guidance, avoiding dubious promises. The process requires caution and solid evidence regardless of the media demonstrating the relevance of the work. Thus, press articles are valuable but not indispensable to demonstrate leadership and recognition in the EB-1.

Read full answer →

Newspaper articles about me are behind a paywall. Now what?

When preparing an EB-1 visa petition in the U.S., it is crucial to gather evidence that demonstrates your professional relevance, such as news articles. When these are behind a paywall, it is recommended to obtain official copies directly from the media outlet, through formal requests or contact with public relations, possibly including statements explaining access restrictions. Alternatively, archived versions in digital libraries or services like the Wayback Machine can be used, provided their authenticity is confirmed, considering immigration agencies require legitimate documents. Finally, it is essential to follow immigration laws, seek specialized guidance, and avoid miracle offers, ensuring documents respect copyrights and contain truthful information for a robust petition.

Read full answer →

Do virtual exhibitions on the internet count as ‘display’?

The EB-1 visa requires proof of significant achievements in various areas, traditionally through physical exhibitions. With technological advances, virtual exhibitions may be considered ‘display’ if they demonstrate relevant reach and impact to the field's audience. Simply online publication is insufficient; solid evidence such as dissemination through recognized media, testimonials, and prestige data must exist. Each case is individually evaluated by USCIS, making detailed and well-prepared documentation crucial. It is recommended to strictly follow laws, seek reliable sources, and professional guidance to ensure compliance. Awareness of scams is essential to preserve integrity in the EB-1 visa process.

Read full answer →

Doubts about the relationship between the foreign company and the American one generate an RFE?

In EB-1 immigration processes, it is essential to present clear and consistent documents so USCIS can evaluate without doubts. The connection between the foreign company and its American counterpart is often questioned; ambiguities in this link may lead to the issuance of an RFE (Request for Evidence), requesting additional evidence. An RFE does not necessarily imply denial but requires detailed proofs about organizational structure, financial or operational ties. Preparing a complete and organized dossier that clearly demonstrates this relationship is fundamental. Additionally, strictly following immigration laws, seeking reliable experts, and avoiding unfounded promises help minimize chances of an RFE and expedite the process.

Read full answer →

What is the fee for the I-140?

The I-140 Form is fundamental in the EB-1 visa process, for individuals with extraordinary abilities, requesting recognition from the US government for an immigration benefit based on experience and professional qualification. The processing fee is currently US$ 700 in most cases, but may be updated by USCIS, so it is essential to check the official website before submitting the application. In addition to monitoring updates, it is vital to strictly follow the form instructions and immigration laws. Miracle or guaranteed offers should be avoided, seeking reliable support and ignoring scams. Staying informed and acting in accordance with the law is the best way to ensure the success of the process.

Read full answer →

Can I mention that I collaborated with a famous foundation without awards?

The EB-1 visa requires proving extraordinary abilities through awards, publications, and recognized achievements. However, collaboration with a famous foundation, even without formal awards, can be a positive differentiator if demonstrated with concrete evidence, such as project reports and recommendation letters. It is essential to prove the impact and relevance of this contribution to the field of expertise. Furthermore, the process must strictly follow U.S. immigration laws, avoiding inaccurate information. It is recommended to seek reliable sources and support from specialized professionals to ensure the adequacy and solidity of the documentation, thus strengthening the case within the criteria required by the EB-1.

Read full answer →

My earnings as a TikTok influencer are high. Does this count as a ‘high salary’?

The EB-1 visa, intended for individuals with extraordinary abilities, requires solid evidence of professional recognition, including high earnings, awards, and publications. For TikTok influencers, proving a high income is important but not sufficient. USCIS evaluates a set of proofs encompassing market power, follower relevance, media mentions, and other indicators of national or international prominence. The analysis is holistic and can vary according to the case. Therefore, it is essential to also present unique contribution, community influence, and market impact. Moreover, complying with US immigration laws and avoiding dubious promises is fundamental. Professional support and organized documentation are recommended to strengthen the application. This information is general and does not replace specialized legal advice.

Read full answer →

Is it necessary to submit the I-765 (EAD) together with the I-485?

When applying for adjustment of status under the EB-1 visa, submitting the I-765 form for work authorization (EAD) alongside the I-485 is optional and depends on the applicant's goal. The I-485 adjusts the immigration status, while the I-765 allows work permission during the application review. If you plan not to work, the I-765 is not mandatory; if you wish to work or seek employment in the US, attaching the I-765 offers greater financial flexibility and experience. It is crucial to fulfill legal requirements and stay informed on USCIS updates to avoid issues and ensure proper document submission, protecting yourself from scams and maintaining compliance with immigration laws.

Read full answer →

I am a former medal-winning athlete, but that was 20 years ago. What now?

The EB-1 visa is intended for individuals with extraordinary abilities, including athletes recognized nationally and internationally. Although achievements from 20 years ago require careful evaluation, they can remain relevant if there is evidence proving lasting impact on the sport or sports community. Robust documentation, such as certificates, publications, and letters from experts, is essential to demonstrate excellence. Additionally, continuity of influence through training, consulting, or recent sports projects strengthens the application. Attention to the process is crucial, as U.S. immigration legislation is complex; inadequate documentation can harm the petition. It is recommended to seek reliable sources and expert support to avoid false promises and ensure legal compliance. A thorough analysis of the professional background, aligned with EB-1 requirements, is fundamental for a solid and strategic petition, turning past achievements into a relevant differentiator for approval.

Read full answer →

Is being an editor of a local journal comparable to ‘participating as a judge’?

The US EB-1 visa recognizes individuals with extraordinary abilities by evaluating evidence such as acting as a judge or editor of professional works. Being a judge, which involves evaluating scientific, artistic, or professional works, usually demonstrates strong recognition in the field, indicating that the individual is a respected reference. The role of editor, even in local journals, can be relevant if the journal is credible and the position involves reviewing works; however, journals with limited reach tend to have less impact compared to serving as a judge. Documentation for the EB-1 must clearly evidence the relevance and scope of these contributions. In case of doubt, specialized evaluation and consultation of immigration laws are recommended to avoid complications and protect against inaccurate information or unfounded promises. Each profile is unique, and USCIS focuses on evidence of impact and recognition in the field, making it crucial to demonstrate that your achievements ensure prominence in the sector.

Read full answer →

Recommendation letters without letterhead or official paper. Is it a problem?

Recommendation letters are essential to demonstrate professional recognition in the EB-1 visa process and influence the perception of immigration authorities. The absence of letterhead or official paper can raise questions regarding the authenticity and credibility of the document, since letterhead indicates the recommender's affiliation with a recognized institution. However, each case is evaluated individually, and in situations with strong documentation and other elements that prove the legitimacy of the letters, the lack of letterhead may be relativized. Still, it is advisable to present documents in the most formal format available to avoid doubts. Finally, it is vital to strictly follow U.S. immigration laws and seek specialized guidance, avoiding misleading promises, ensuring transparency and compliance in the process.

Read full answer →

Can the I-140 and I-485 be filed together if I am on B-2 status?

The adjustment of immigrant status process in the U.S., especially for the EB-1, may involve the simultaneous submission of the I-140 and I-485 (concurrent filing), depending on the applicant's status. On B-2 status (tourism), caution should be exercised, as this visa does not allow dual intent, while the I-485 demonstrates immigrant intent, which may imply risks of bad faith or fraud. Concurrent adjustment of status on B-2 status depends on the individual's profile, the underlying immigrant visa, and compliance with status time limits. If the visa and conditions are not compatible, the process may be compromised. The importance of strict compliance with immigration laws, consulting official sources, and seeking reliable specialized advice is emphasized. In short, concurrent filing may be possible, but B-2 status requires careful evaluation to avoid violating rules and to ensure all requirements are met.

Read full answer →

I was a columnist for a corporate magazine. Is it as good as an independent magazine?

When applying for the EB-1 visa in the US, especially in the extraordinary ability category, it is essential to analyze the nature and credibility of the publications. Having been a columnist for a corporate magazine can be a positive point; however, independent publications usually have more weight as they offer impartial recognition. Nonetheless, if the corporate magazine has wide recognition, circulation, and editorial rigor, it can add value. Each case is evaluated individually, considering solid evidence of extraordinary contribution. It is imperative to follow immigration laws and seek specialized advice to avoid dubious offers and ensure legal compliance. The adequate presentation and contextualization of publications, regardless of the vehicle, are decisive for the success of the process.

Read full answer →

I mention leadership in a project funded by the NSF. Is it significant?

In the context of the EB-1 visa, leading an NSF-funded project is a significant indicator of prestige and competence, as it demonstrates participation in a high-level project and responsibility in the field. Immigration officers seek evidence of the applicant's extraordinary ability; leadership in an NSF project is a strong point, especially if accompanied by recognitions such as publications, awards, and international events. However, no single criterion guarantees approval; the evaluation considers the set of evidence. It is essential to follow US laws, avoid unfounded promises, and seek reliable guidance for informed decisions. Each case is analyzed individually, making it indispensable to present multiple elements that reinforce the professional's position in the field.

Read full answer →

I requested a letter from the mayor praising my work. Is this proof?

For EB-1 visas, it is essential to demonstrate extraordinary abilities and recognition in the field. A letter from the mayor praising your work may serve as evidence, especially if it represents significant and broadly relevant recognition, but it usually is not enough to fulfill all criteria required by US immigration. The process values a diversified set of proofs, such as awards, specialized publications, participation as a judge in conferences, and other clear signs of extraordinary ability. To strengthen your application, gather evidence from different sources, selecting documents that showcase the quality and impact of your work. It is crucial to strictly follow immigration laws, avoiding presenting isolated or insufficient evidence that may compromise the petition. Consulting qualified immigration professionals is recommended, along with caution against dubious offers and unfounded promises, as they can harm your credibility and chances of success. Thus, a detailed and careful review of documents increases the likelihood of EB-1 visa approval.

Read full answer →

As CFO abroad and CFO in the US, completing 1 year. Is that ok?

The EB-1 visa, in the subcategory for multinational executives and managers, requires proof of service in a managerial or executive role abroad for at least one year within the three years prior to holding a similar position in the US. Serving as CFO abroad and then in the US for one year can meet the criteria, provided the responsibilities correspond to those required. Each case is individually evaluated based on functions, company structure, and documentary evidence confirming the continuity and relevance of the managerial role. The mere duration of the roles does not guarantee approval but is a fundamental requirement. It is crucial to obey immigration laws and seek reliable specialized guidance, avoiding unfounded promises. Organizing complete documentation and consulting advisory is recommended to define the best strategy.

Read full answer →

My patent does not generate royalties, but it is cited in many articles. Is that good?

The United States EB-1 visa is intended for individuals with extraordinary abilities. Having a patent without royalties but cited in several articles indicates relevance and influence in the academic or professional environment, evidencing a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or technology. The frequency of citations reinforces this demonstration and shows an impact recognized by experts. Each case is evaluated individually, requiring a consistent set of evidence, including citations, awards, and recommendations. It is essential to strictly follow immigration laws and seek specialized guidance to avoid scams and strengthen the process, which is complex and personalized.

Read full answer →

My thesis was internationally awarded, but it was 8 years ago. Does it still count?

International awards, such as those for EB-1 visas, are strong evidence, but the date of the award is a factor considered. A thesis awarded 8 years ago can still be relevant if there is career consistency and other continued evidence, such as citations, conferences, additional awards, and invitations to lectures. Each case is evaluated individually, considering professional evolution and updated documentation to prove ongoing relevance. It is essential to follow US immigration laws and avoid unfounded promises. Consulting reliable specialists helps align the trajectory with the current requirements of the EB-1 visa, highlighting contributions that influence and innovate the field.

Read full answer →

My patent generated royalties of US$1 for each sale. If 2 million were sold, that is 2 million dollars. Does that count?

If your patent generates US$1 in royalties per sale and 2 million units were sold, the total will be about US$2 million. However, for the EB-1 visa, the financial amount is only one aspect. The main focus is to demonstrate extraordinary ability, proven by awards, publications, committee participation, and national or international recognition. Royalties reinforce the argument, as they indicate commercial value and market recognition, but it is essential to present complete documentation that evidences impact, relevance, and sustainability. Furthermore, it is fundamental to comply with US immigration laws by maintaining accurate records, contracts, and financial statements. Specialized guidance is recommended to ensure legal compliance and avoid scams or unfounded promises. Thus, commercial success can contribute significantly, provided it is integrated into a solid set of evidence of extraordinary ability.

Read full answer →

How to cite business awards, like ‘Best Startup of the Year’?

When preparing a petition for the EB-1 visa, it is essential to present business awards, such as 'Best Startup of the Year', as evidence of your professional background and international recognition. For this, you should cite the full name of the award, the institution that granted it, the date, and, if possible, the selection criteria, showing that the award is based on concrete merits. It is also recommended to attach official documentation, such as certificates and press releases, to validate the authenticity before immigration authorities. It is fundamental to follow United States immigration laws, always maintaining the truthfulness of the information to avoid legal problems and fraud. Seeking reliable sources and specialized guidance reinforces the security of the process. Adopting an honest and well-founded stance is the best strategy to demonstrate recognition and professional excellence.

Read full answer →

My CV is 20 pages long. Should I send it all?

In immigration processes such as the EB-1 visa, objectivity and clarity are essential. An extensive resume can hinder the evaluation. It is recommended to curate content, focusing on awards, publications, patents, and other evidence of international recognition or contribution in the field. The quality of information matters more than the number of pages. The material must follow U.S. laws and guidelines, preferably prepared with ethical and legal experts. Avoid miracle promises; the process is complex and requires attention to all requirements. Submit only what is strictly relevant to demonstrate your qualification, with a clear, objective, and organized document, respecting rules and avoiding risks to the process.

Read full answer →

I received invitations to be a mentor at recognized incubators. Is it a ‘critical role’ or a ‘judge’?

For the EB-1 visa, it is crucial to analyze your functions and how they fit U.S. immigration criteria. Being a mentor at recognized incubators can represent a critical role, evidencing authority and sector influence, or, if it involves formal selection and evaluation of projects, it can be interpreted as acting as a judge, valued in the process. The distinction depends on the type of participation: advising indicates a critical role; careful evaluation suggests a judge role. Detailed documentation of activities, recognition, and roles played is fundamental. It is essential to comply with U.S. laws and seek specialized guidance to identify robust evidence for EB-1, avoiding unfounded promises, as the decision is rigorous and every detail can influence the final result.

Read full answer →

Should I translate materials from German?

For the EB-1 visa in the U.S., documents must be clear and translated into English if they are not originally in that language. Documents in German require official certified translation so authorities can understand the content and verify its authenticity. The translation must be done by a qualified professional to ensure accuracy and avoid delays or harm to the process. Avoid informal services and non-certified translations. It is crucial to strictly follow immigration laws and consult specialists to avoid complications. Use reliable sources and proceed cautiously throughout the process, meeting all official requirements to ensure a proper review of your case by the immigration service.

Read full answer →

Open-source projects I created, millions of downloads. Is it ‘commercial success’?

The EB-1 visa is intended for individuals who have achieved extraordinary levels of success, including international recognition, awards, and commercial successes when applicable. In the case of open-source projects with millions of downloads, the significant impact on the technology community may demonstrate influence and recognition, but US immigration generally expects metrics of direct commercial impact such as revenues and market share. Since open-source projects tend not to generate revenue directly, it is important to present a broad view of success, including contributions to technological advancement, academic citations, professional testimonials, and active communities. Each case is unique and requires robust documentation evidencing impact and relevance. Furthermore, it is essential to follow US immigration laws and seek professional guidance, as the process is complex and requires careful analysis to avoid unfounded promises.

Read full answer →

Can I rely on awards from online competitions (hackathons, game jams)?

The United States EB-1 visa is designed for individuals with extraordinary abilities and requires robust evidence of recognition. Awards from online competitions, such as hackathons and game jams, may be part of the portfolio but should be considered in the broad context of the career. The process values national or international recognition, relevant contributions, publications, participation as jurors, and highly prestigious awards. Therefore, these online awards should compose a larger set of proofs that attest to consistent prominence. It is recommended to complement with documents that reinforce recognition, such as letters from experts, additional certifications, and indicators of significant impact in the area. It is essential to respect U.S. immigration laws and avoid unfounded promises. Consulting specialized professionals helps build a solid dossier and assess if the awards meet the required level. Acting with caution and information is crucial for each element of the portfolio to effectively demonstrate the candidate's exceptionality.

Read full answer →

At what age under 14 is a minor exempt from the consular interview?

In the immigration process to the United States, stages vary according to the applicant's profile and visa type. An essential phase is the consular interview, which aims to evaluate eligibility and document authenticity. However, legislation provides exemption for children under 14 years old, who normally do not need to attend the interview, thus facilitating the process for families. Despite this, it is imperative to fulfill all other requirements and provide appropriate documentation. It is always recommended to consult updated information at the U.S. consulate or embassy, as regulations may change. Strictly following laws and seeking information from official sources avoids setbacks and ensures that the family process aligns with the requirements for visa acquisition.

Read full answer →

How do I cite regional e-sports awards?

For the EB-1 visa in the United States, it is essential to prove achievements clearly and well documented, including regional e-sports awards. Detail the award name, granting organization, year, and regional prestige to strengthen your petition. Explain the importance of the award in the e-sports context and provide supporting documents such as certificates, official publications, and media mentions. It is crucial to follow U.S. immigration laws and consult reliable sources, avoiding dubious offers. Transparency and accuracy in information contribute to a solid history, demonstrating ability and recognition, aligning with the requirements of U.S. authorities.

Read full answer →

After submitting the I-140, can I work for another company?

Filing the I-140 is a crucial step toward permanent residency but allows for variations regarding job changes. For petitions based on a specific job offer, changing jobs before the adjustment of status (I-485) is consolidated can harm the process. In the EB-1A, which does not require an exclusive job offer, there is greater flexibility. After I-140 approval and 180 days with the adjustment of status pending, portability (Section AC21) allows changing employers, provided the new position is similar. It is essential to follow immigration laws and consult specialists to avoid errors and inaccurate information that could jeopardize the process.

Read full answer →

My h-index is 12. Is that considered high?

The h-index measures academic productivity and impact and is one of several criteria for visas like the EB-1, targeted at extraordinary abilities. An h-index of 12 may signal promising output in some areas but may be considered low standard in others. Immigration authorities consider the candidate's entire trajectory, including awards, patents, and scientific recognitions. It is crucial to follow US laws, seek official information, and get expert assistance to avoid mistakes and fraud. Every case is unique and requires a comprehensive profile evaluation. Thus, an h-index of 12 is a partial indicator; detailed analysis is essential for success in the EB-1.

Read full answer →

Awards received on LinkedIn (e.g., local top influencer) do not have much credibility, right?

In the EB-1 category, it is essential to demonstrate extraordinary achievements recognized nationally or internationally in areas such as science, arts, education, business, or athletics. Relevant awards must be granted by recognized organizations, with clear criteria and a solid history. Awards from platforms like LinkedIn, for example, "local top influencer," generally have a promotional character and regional scope, being of little value in immigration processes. Authorities give greater weight to awards with rigorous selection and proven reach. It is recommended to present a diversified portfolio with robust evidence, including awards, publications, citations, and institutional connections. It is crucial to follow US immigration laws and rely on specialized guidance to ensure a safe and complete process, avoiding false promises.

Read full answer →

Is receiving research grants from renowned entities a criterion?

The EB-1 visa is intended for professionals with extraordinary abilities recognized by prestigious entities, including research grants. However, receiving grants does not guarantee approval on its own; the process requires a robust set of evidence such as publications, awards, and independent evaluations. It is vital to comply with immigration laws and follow official guidelines, consulting specialists to avoid risks and prepare consistent documentation. Grants reinforce recognition of work but make up a broad set of criteria that demonstrate excellence and international relevance. Acting with precise information and legal compliance is the safest way to achieve success with the EB-1 visa.

Read full answer →

Can letters from my immediate supervisor be seen as biased?

The EB-1 visa is for people with extraordinary abilities. Letters from immediate supervisors can be biased due to conflicts of interest or a limited view of results, but they are not disqualified. They should be presented along with independent references, such as renowned experts, colleagues, or clients, to corroborate expertise. Diversifying sources strengthens eligibility by showing broad recognition. Following US immigration laws and seeking specialized professionals is essential. Beware of miracle promises and consult experts to properly structure documentation, ensuring a transparent and solid process.

Read full answer →

Can I submit flyers and posters as proof of exhibition of my work?

When applying for the EB‑1 visa, it is essential to prove your achievements and the visibility of your work. Flyers and posters can be submitted as evidence, provided they include supplementary documentation that contextualizes and evidences their relevance and impact. It is important to detail the event or exhibition, specifying the date, location, target audience, and, if possible, results or media coverage that confirm the event's reach. When linked to recognized exhibitions, additional materials such as reviews, testimonials, and news articles strengthen the proof. It is also recommended to strictly follow the USCIS criteria and seek reliable guidance, avoiding unfounded promises. In the EB‑1 context, robust and well-structured evidence is decisive to demonstrate your leading position, and each item must objectively contribute to evidencing your exceptionality. Thus, flyers and posters are valid, provided they are part of a consistent and verifiable portfolio.

Read full answer →

Is publishing a preprint without peer review weak?

In the United States, immigration processes such as the EB-1 visa require solid evidence of extraordinary achievements, including academic publications. Preprints are articles made available before peer review, an essential step to validate quality and credibility. For immigration processes, publications reviewed by experts are generally more valued than preprints, which may be considered initial contributions but do not carry the same weight. Nonetheless, the relevance of preprints can be assessed alongside other elements proving excellence and impact. It is crucial to follow U.S. laws and regulations, build a robust portfolio with peer-reviewed publications, and seek reliable information to avoid misunderstandings and strengthen the process before the authorities.

Read full answer →

Reviewer and associate editor in a Q2 journal. Does it count as 1 or 2 criteria?

For the EB-1 visa, performing functions as reviewer and associate editor in recognized journals (Q2) serves as important evidence of professional recognition. Acting as a reviewer demonstrates expertise and peer valuation, while the associate editor position indicates a leadership role and responsibility in the editorial process. USCIS evaluates the evidence globally and may consider each role as a distinct line of proof, provided they are well documented and relevant in impact and scope. It is essential to follow U.S. immigration laws and seek specialized guidance to build a solid petition, avoiding unfounded promises. A careful analysis of roles and recognitions is key to demonstrating prestige and extraordinary contribution in the EB-1.

Read full answer →

Do I need to prove that I remain in the same field after getting the green card?

The EB-1 visa focuses on the achievements that qualified the immigrant for the USA, without requiring formal permanence in the same field after the green card. However, maintaining consistency in the career can prevent authorities' questions, especially if the change is abrupt and impacts the perception of the exceptional skills that justified the benefit. It is not a requirement to present continuous evidence of the same activity, but aligning the career with the original field helps consolidate the immigration status in the long term, reducing risks in future processes such as naturalization. It is essential to comply with US laws, avoid scams, and seek qualified professional advice to ensure compliance and safety in the process.

Read full answer →

Mentions in an MIT academic blog that cited me. Does it count as media coverage?

For the EB-1 visa, intended for individuals with extraordinary abilities, media mentions are relevant but must be evaluated in the overall context of the case. A citation in an academic blog linked to MIT can be considered media, especially if it is independent, editorial, and shows recognition within the academic or professional community. However, immigration officers analyze the quality, reach, and relevance of the publication to validate its impact on the process. Isolated or inconsistent mentions have limited impact. The presentation of a diversified portfolio, including awards, high-impact publications, and peer citations, is recommended to strengthen the case. Furthermore, strict compliance with U.S. immigration laws and expert guidance are essential, avoiding promises of guaranteed results that do not reflect the reality of official processes. Each piece of evidence carries its own weight, requiring a careful and well-founded approach to analyze the professional profile for the EB-1.

Read full answer →

My position was ‘manager’, but I did not have the power to hire or fire. Is that a problem?

The EB-1 visa requires proof of achievements and prominent positions in areas such as business, science, and education, considering factors like work relevance, complexity of activities, and influence within the organization. Holding the title of 'manager' without direct decision-making powers such as hiring or firing does not invalidate proving an executive or managerial role if the full set of responsibilities and achievements is evaluated, including project supervision, operational improvements, and team leadership. It is essential to organize documents, letters of recommendation, and evidence demonstrating the impact of activities. Position interpretation varies according to professional background, making it crucial to follow U.S. immigration laws and avoid unreliable sources. Careful profile analysis and legal compliance ensure fair and transparent evaluation in the immigration process.

Read full answer →

My 19-year-old daughter will come as a dependent. Can she work?

When choosing the EB-1 immigration process, the principal beneficiary and their dependents, such as your 19-year-old daughter, acquire the green card, which grants them the right to work legally in the U.S. without the need for a specific work visa. It is essential to strictly comply with immigration laws during all phases of the process and entry into the country, observing official documentation and procedures. It is recommended to seek updated information from official sources and immigration specialists to avoid risks arising from dubious promises or lack of legal support. Staying informed and following legislation ensures full enjoyment of the benefits of permanent resident status.

Read full answer →