English 
Português 
Español 
The relationship between Americans and immigration is going through a curious moment. While the federal government tightens rules, accelerates deportations, and restricts visas, public opinion is moving in the opposite direction. A poll by the Gallup Institute released in mid-2025 showed that 79% of Americans see immigration as a positive force for the country — the highest level recorded in 25 years.
The finding contradicts the assumption that restrictive policies reflect popular sentiment. In 2024, 55% of citizens supported reducing the number of immigrants entering the country; a year later, that figure dropped to 30%. The reversal is one of the sharpest ever documented by Gallup since the historical series began in 2001, when support for immigration stood at 64%.
The Drivers Behind the Shift
Public opinion experts point to three key drivers of the change. The first is a growing recognition of immigrants’ economic role. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that foreign-born workers account for about 18% of the U.S. labor force, with even higher shares in essential sectors such as agriculture (close to 30%), construction (around 24%), and technology (approximately 22%).
The second driver is the visible impact of mass deportations on specific communities. News stories about farms that lost their workforce, restaurants that closed, and hospitals facing staff shortages brought a portion of the population face-to-face with the practical consequences of restrictive policies. Abstract theory became a concrete problem.
The third factor is inverted political polarization. When a policy becomes the signature of a particular administration, voters from the opposing party tend to distance themselves from it — even if they previously supported it. This phenomenon explains why part of the Democratic electorate, once more skeptical of large-scale migration, now advocates for more open positions.
Republicans Also Shifted
The most surprising movement in the poll came from Republican voters. In 2024, 88% of Republicans favored reducing immigration. By 2025, that number had plummeted to 48%. Even more striking, 64% of Republicans now believe immigration delivers net benefits to the country — a position that was a minority view within the party until recently.
Among Hispanic voters, approval of the federal government’s immigration policies stands at just 21%, compared with a national average of 35%. The figure carries significant electoral weight for 2026 and 2028, as Latino voters represent a growing share of the electorate in swing states such as Arizona, Nevada, Texas, and Florida.
Appetite for Border Security Measures Weakens
The poll also recorded a decline in support for border enforcement measures. Backing for expanding the Border Patrol fell from 76% to 59% in a single year — a drop of 17 percentage points. Support for building new barriers on the border with Mexico lost even more ground: only 45% of respondents favor the measure.
This does not mean Americans have come to advocate for open borders. The majority still endorses some level of control and order in entry processes. What changed is the enthusiasm for dramatic solutions such as physical walls and a rapid expansion of enforcement agents. The public appears to prefer more sophisticated administrative tools — such as strengthening immigration courts and modernizing ports of entry.
The Contradiction Between Opinion and Policy
The most paradoxical finding in the series is the coexistence of broad support for immigration alongside approval of the president on immigration issues. Donald Trump maintains relatively high approval ratings on national security, and part of the electorate continues to endorse a firm stance against irregular entry — even while simultaneously favoring more legal, regular immigration.
This apparent contradiction is less contradictory than it seems. Americans appear to draw, with increasing clarity, a distinction between orderly immigration (visas, green cards, formal processes) and irregular border crossings in the south. The former gains support; the latter continues to generate resistance. The challenge for policymakers is to build legal pathways robust enough to absorb demand and, in doing so, reduce pressure on clandestine crossings.
Immigrants and the American Economy
Recent studies by the National Foundation for American Policy and the Cato Institute reinforce the economic argument. Companies founded by immigrants or their children account for a disproportionate share of job creation and corporate revenue in the U.S. Among the 500 largest companies listed in the Fortune 500, more than 40% have immigrant founders or direct descendants of immigrants.
In the technology sector, the presence is even more pronounced. More than half of Silicon Valley startups valued at over $1 billion have at least one immigrant co-founder. This concentration helps explain why executives at giants such as Google, Microsoft, and NVIDIA have openly pressured for reforms that expand visas for skilled talent.
Implications for Those Planning to Immigrate
For foreign professionals considering a move to the United States, the Gallup poll carries practical implications. First, the social environment tends to be more welcoming than restrictive headlines suggest. Second, the economic argument in favor of skilled immigration has support in both data and public opinion, making it unlikely that merit-based visas such as the EB-1, EB-2, EB-2 NIW, and O-1 will face severe cuts.
Third, the contradiction between public opinion and public policy suggests that regulatory changes may swing in the coming years. Anyone building an immigration plan should avoid betting everything on specific legal windows and instead build strategies with more than one possible route. This means combining, for example, academic qualifications, proof of professional impact, and an international portfolio capable of supporting national interest arguments.
History shows that periods of restrictive rhetoric frequently coexist with a quiet expansion of merit-based visas, especially when the economy needs talent. The 2025 Gallup poll suggests that may be exactly the scenario now unfolding. For those who prepare in advance — with solid documentation and a consistent professional strategy — the environment remains more favorable than it appears.
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.
