English 
Português 
Español 
Receiving a Notice to Appear is the event that formally initiates removal proceedings in U.S. immigration court. The document, issued by the Department of Homeland Security, lists the reasons why the government believes the person has no right to remain in the United States and summons their appearance before an Immigration Judge. How a person responds to an NTA defines their immigration future: late responses, failure to appear, or a poorly built strategy result in a removal order; serious, technical, and proactive preparation creates a real possibility of maintaining legal status and continuing to live in the country.
What is EOIR
The Executive Office for Immigration Review, part of the Department of Justice, administers U.S. immigration courts. The agency operates more than 70 courts across the country, with judges specialized in immigration law who decide on removal petitions, asylum claims, cancellation of removal, adjustment of status in court, and humanitarian protections. Unlike the regular court system, immigration courts are administrative — they are part of the Executive Branch, not the Judiciary — and follow procedural rules set out in 8 CFR Part 1003.
In 2026, the backlog of pending cases in immigration courts exceeded 3.5 million cases, according to TRAC Immigration data. Despite the volume, scheduled individual hearings proceed even during periods of administrative instability, and postponements initiated by the immigrant require solid procedural justification.
Process structure
Processing an NTA follows predictable stages. The first is the Master Calendar Hearing, an initial hearing in which the judge confirms identity, preferred language, and right to representation. At this stage the person may admit or deny the NTA allegations, request time to find an attorney, and indicate which forms of relief they intend to seek.
Next comes the pleadings phase and submission of relief applications, with call dates for delivery of evidence. The final hearing is the Individual Hearing (also called the merits hearing), in which the judge reviews testimony, documents, and legal arguments before deciding. The decision may be delivered orally at the hearing or issued in writing afterward.
Those who lose at the first level may appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals within 30 days of the decision. BIA decisions may be reviewed by federal Circuit Courts of Appeals in select cases.
Forms of relief
The defense in court depends on identifying which reliefs the person is eligible to seek. The main categories include:
- Adjustment of Status under INA § 245(a) for those who entered legally, maintain eligibility, and have an approved I-130 or I-140 petition with a current priority date
- Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents under INA § 240A(a), requiring 7 years of continuous residence, 5 years as an LPR, and no convictions for aggravated felonies
- Cancellation of Removal for Non-LPRs under INA § 240A(b), requiring 10 years of continuous physical presence, good moral character, and a showing of exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying U.S. citizen or resident relative
- Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and Convention Against Torture under INA §§ 208, 241(b)(3) and regulations derived from the Convention Against Torture for those who fear persecution or torture in their country of origin
- VAWA Self-Petition under the Violence Against Women Act for victims of domestic violence perpetrated by a U.S. citizen or resident spouse
- U Visa for victims of serious crimes who cooperated with authorities
- T Visa for victims of human trafficking
- Voluntary Departure under INA § 240B as an option to leave without a formal removal order
Each relief has its own eligibility requirements, deadlines, and burden of proof. Choosing the wrong legal theory can foreclose defense options that were available at the outset of the case.
Documents and evidence
Building the case depends on organized and complete documentation. Essential materials include:
- Complete immigration history: passports, prior visas, I-94s, prior decisions from USCIS, EOIR, or federal courts
- Civil identity documents: birth, marriage, divorce, and death certificates of relevant family members
- Financial history: U.S. tax returns (1040), W-2s, 1099s, pay stubs, and bank statements covering the period of presence in the United States
- Family ties: documents proving kinship with U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents
- Evidence of good moral character: letters from employers, religious leaders, community organizations, teachers, and neighbors
- Complete criminal history: background check clearances, sentences, probation orders, and court dispositions from any interaction with the criminal justice system
- Medical and psychological evaluations when relevant to hardship or trauma
Form EOIR-28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance) is the foundation of legal representation and must be filed before any other procedural action is taken on behalf of the immigrant.
Deadlines and timing
Cases of individuals detained in ICE facilities follow accelerated schedules, with Master Calendar Hearings within a few weeks and Individual Hearings within a few months. Non-detained cases may wait two to seven years between the initial Master Calendar and the Individual Hearing, especially in congested courts such as New York, Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and San Francisco.
The period between the NTA and the final hearing should be used to stabilize eligibility and build evidence. Individuals who maintain continuous physical presence, good moral character, family ties, and economic contribution strengthen their profiles for reliefs such as Cancellation of Removal. Those who remain eligible for asylum must file Form I-589 within the one-year filing deadline from entry or demonstrate applicable exceptions.
Individual hearing
The Individual Hearing is the critical moment of the process. The judge hears testimony from the immigrant and supporting witnesses, reviews documents, and analyzes legal arguments. A well-prepared presentation requires:
- Detailed knowledge of one’s own immigration history and every document submitted
- Ability to answer questions at the hearing about specific facts, dates, and circumstances
- Consistency between oral testimony and previously submitted written declarations
- Sworn interpretation for those who choose to testify in a language other than English
- Presence of witnesses with direct knowledge of the relevant facts
Inconsistencies between documents and testimony, or between different versions of a story, can support a denial based on an adverse credibility finding, particularly in asylum cases.
Appeal and judicial review
The Immigration Judge’s decision is not final. The Board of Immigration Appeals reviews decisions on the merits and may affirm, reverse, or remand for a new hearing. The deadline to appeal is strictly 30 days, and missing that deadline extinguishes the right to administrative review.
Final BIA decisions may be subject to a Petition for Review in the federal Circuit Courts of Appeals corresponding to the location of the hearing. The Circuit covering the court determines jurisdiction for judicial review.
Why starting early matters
Building a strong defense takes time. Gathering documents from abroad, obtaining witness statements, securing psychological evaluations for hardship or asylum cases, and preparing a sworn statement cannot be done in a matter of weeks. Individuals who begin organizing immediately after receiving the NTA arrive at the Individual Hearing with thorough documentation, a coherent narrative, and a defined legal strategy.
Delaying the search for legal guidance increases the risk of missing procedural deadlines, failing to present available relief, and facing the hearing without consolidated evidence. In removal cases, preparation is not a luxury — it is the decisive factor between leaving with a permanent status document or leaving with a removal order.
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.
