What are the main challenges when responding to an RFE about economic impact evidence?

Responding to an RFE (Request for Evidence) about economic impact in an EB-2 NIW petition tends to be challenging because it requires turning your contribution into concrete, verifiable evidence. The officer wants to understand, in objective terms, why your work is likely to benefit the U.S. economy.

The first challenge lies in the very nature of the proof: demonstrating economic impact calls for well-organized data and a narrative that connects it, not just generic statements. When the material is vague or scattered, it becomes hard for the reviewer to see the intended relevance.

• Showing in a tangible way that your work generates or preserves economic activity, innovation, or sector-level development.
• Dealing with criteria that are assessed on a case-by-case basis and allow for a degree of subjectivity.
• Gathering opinions from independent experts who can confirm the significance of your work.
• Organizing everything into a clear argument so that the reviewer does not need to be in your field to understand it.

Overcoming these points requires contextualizing each piece of evidence and tying it to the national interest. Since every case is unique, it is worth checking the latest USCIS guidance and seeking specialized support when putting together your response.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.