When an RFE (Request for Evidence) questions the validity of your Academic Evaluation in an EB-2 NIW petition, the officer’s goal is typically to confirm that the evaluation is credible, well-grounded, and issued by a qualified entity. Your response must address that concern directly and thoroughly.
The first step is to re-read the RFE and identify the specific point being challenged: it may relate to the methodology used, the credentials of the evaluating institution, or the supporting documentation. With that clear, build a structured response that substantiates the document’s validity. The following elements commonly help:
- A detailed description of the evaluation criteria and methodology.
- The credentials and reputation of the evaluating entity or professional.
- Supporting evidence such as certificates, credentials, and an official letter confirming the authenticity of the evaluation.
Address each point raised in the RFE in turn, emphasizing transparency and adherence to established standards. A clear, well-documented response demonstrates seriousness and strengthens the overall case.
Respond within the deadline stated in the notice and, if you are uncertain about the best way to organize your materials, consider reviewing updated USCIS guidance and working with an experienced immigration professional.
Learn more about EB-2 NIW
- Category
- EB-2 NIW Green Card
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- PERM
- Waived
- Processing
- 12-36 months
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.