How to respond to an RFE questioning the originality of your academic contributions?

Upon receiving an RFE (Request for Evidence) questioning the originality of your academic contributions within an EB-2 NIW visa application, it is natural to feel concerned. This USCIS request aims to obtain more evidence to demonstrate that your achievements indeed have a significant impact in your field and are not generic or repeated works.

It is important to remember that when dealing with immigration to the United States, strictly following the established laws and deadlines is essential, as well as seeking information from reliable sources to avoid pitfalls or unfounded promises of results.

An effective strategy to respond to these questions involves organizing and presenting robust and detailed documentation that proves the originality of your work. This may include, for example, copies of publications, patents, conference presentations, and peer-reviewed articles, accompanied by statements from experts who know and validate your unique contribution to the field. Recommendation letters or statements from authorities in the area can strengthen the argument, especially if they highlight how your work differs and brings relevant advantages or innovations.

Make sure that each piece of evidence is clearly correlated with the contributions described in the petition. Additionally, it is advisable to provide a detailed explanation of how your contribution was conceived and implemented. Describing the context of the problem your work addresses, the methods used, and the results achieved can help evaluators understand the relevance and originality of what you developed. This narrative should be objective, focusing on facts and concrete evidence, avoiding exaggerations or unsupported claims.

Always remember that it is crucial to act with transparency and adhere to the requirements of the United States immigration system. Seeking support and guidance from reliable sources – whether through formal consultations with specialized professionals or via official materials – can be a safe way to ensure that your response to the RFE is complete and well-founded. This way, you protect both your process and the integrity of your application, avoiding unnecessary risks and vulnerability to misleading information often present in dubious marketing campaigns.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.