How to respond to an RFE questioning the methodology of your Academic Evaluation?

Upon receiving an RFE (Request for Evidence) questioning the methodology of your Academic Evaluation, it is essential to respond in an organized, detailed manner based on clear evidence. This response is an opportunity to demonstrate that your academic evaluation report follows recognized and accepted criteria in academic and professional circles in the United States.

First, carefully analyze the RFE to understand exactly which aspects of the methodology are being questioned. The officer may have doubts regarding the choice of criteria, the appropriateness of the method used to compare diplomas and qualifications, or how academic equivalents were determined.

After this analysis, organize the documents and evidence supporting the methodology presented in the evaluation, such as detailed reports, statements from experts in the field, and any references to standards and commonly accepted practices both in the country of origin and in the United States.

Next, in your response, clearly and objectively explain the basis used for the academic evaluation. If necessary, include a description of the procedures adopted by the company or specialist who issued the report, highlighting the experience and credentials of these professionals. It is advisable to emphasize how the adopted procedures align with internationally accepted and recognized practices. When possible, include citations or bibliographic references that corroborate the validity of the methods employed.

Additionally, the response to the RFE should address point by point the issues raised, demonstrating that all concerns were considered and answered. Ensure that each doubt expressed by the officer is overcome with supporting documents, additional clarifications, and, if applicable, evidence of relationships between the foreign evaluation system and North American equivalents.

Finally, remember the importance of maintaining a clear, professional, and conciliatory tone in the response. Organize the documentation logically and indicate, if applicable, that the methods adopted meet the requirements and recommended practices of American authorities. Always take into consideration the necessity to strictly follow immigration laws, and if there are any doubts, seek advice from specialized professionals to avoid risks and pitfalls, such as promises of guaranteed results or unauthorized services.

This transparent and well-founded approach can strengthen your argument and demonstrate that the methodology of your Academic Evaluation complies with the standards necessary for the EB-2 NIW process.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.