How to respond to an RFE questioning the consistency of academic documents?

In the EB-2 NIW process, it is common for USCIS to issue an RFE (Request for Evidence) to clarify doubts about the consistency of the academic documents submitted. This can occur, for example, if there are discrepancies in the spelling of names, dates, or details between diplomas, transcripts, and other records.

Below, I explain in a simple and direct manner how to address this issue. First, it is essential to thoroughly review all the academic documents you have submitted. Make sure the information is consistent and corresponds among them.

If you identify discrepancies – for example, differences in the spelling of the name or in the course completion date – gather all complementary documentation that can explain or justify these inconsistencies. This may include sworn translations of the documents (if originally in another language), statements from the educational institution confirming the information, and any other official reports that corroborate the authenticity and continuity of your academic records.

In your RFE response, it is recommended to prepare a clear and objective response letter in which you describe each point USCIS questioned. In it, explain in detail how each document relates to and complements the others, using supporting documentation to reinforce your argument.

If there are documents containing divergent information, include a detailed explanation and, if possible, additional evidence that proves the veracity of your academic records. This approach helps demonstrate that you are fully aware of the importance of maintaining consistency and transparency in your process.

Remember that following the United States immigration laws and seeking specialized advice, preferably from professionals experienced in EB-2 NIW cases, is crucial to ensure your RFE response is complete and accurate. Careful documentation and rigor in presenting information can make a difference in USCIS review, avoiding future problems in the process.

At the same time, it is important to be alert to avoid falling victim to scams or marketing campaigns promising guaranteed results, as each case is unique and immigration law interpretation depends on various factors.

In summary, a well-structured RFE response should:
• Include a detailed review of all academic documents,
• Provide clear and well-founded explanations for any inconsistency identified,
• Include supporting documentation that reinforces the truthfulness and continuity of the information presented,
• Strictly follow legal guidelines and, if necessary, count on the consultancy of qualified professionals.

These practices not only strengthen your case but also demonstrate to USCIS your commitment to transparency and compliance with the process requirements.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.