How to respond to an EB-2 NIW RFE questioning the consistency of academic documents?

A RFE (Request for Evidence) questioning the consistency of academic documents typically arises when there are minor discrepancies across diplomas, transcripts, and other records, such as differences in name spelling or dates. In an EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) case, the right approach is to clarify, with full transparency, that all records refer to the same academic history.

Start by reviewing every document already submitted and identifying exactly what may have raised the concern. For each point:

• Gather supporting documentation that explains the discrepancy, such as certified translations and statements from the academic institution.
• Include official records confirming the authenticity and continuity of your academic background.
• Describe, objectively, how each document relates to and complements the others.

Accompany everything with a clear response letter that addresses each point raised by USCIS one by one, pointing to the evidence that supports each clarification. Consistency and transparency carry more weight than any isolated detail.

Since every case is unique, it is worth confirming the scope of the RFE and the updated requirements with USCIS or with an immigration professional before filing your response.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.