How do you prove that your work is relevant to the development of new information technologies?

In the EB-2 NIW, there is no single formula that labels your work as fundamental to new information technologies: what matters is clear, documented evidence that your activity had a real impact on the field. Relevance is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, based on the body of proof you present.

The goal is to move beyond generic claims and show concrete contributions. The following types of evidence tend to support this argument well:

• Publications, patents, and presentations at industry conferences.
• Letters from recognized experts that detail the significance of your projects.
• Use cases, reports, and results that demonstrate the practical application of your work.
• Innovations you developed that went on to solve real problems in the industry.

The strength of the case lies in the connection between what you did and the advancement it generated, always grounded in transparency and verifiable information. Volume of documents matters less than clarity.

Because the criteria are assessed individually by the relevant authority, it is worth verifying the current requirements at the official source (USCIS) and reviewing your case with a specialist.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.