The Kazarian Analysis is a two-step framework for evaluating the evidence in an EB-1 extraordinary ability petition. Rather than reviewing the evidence loosely, it organizes the case assessment into two distinct stages, helping determine whether a profile genuinely meets the required standard.
The name comes from a well-known court decision that shaped the way this type of petition is commonly examined. In simplified terms, the approach works as follows:
- First, it checks which recognition criteria the applicant actually meets (awards, publications, leading roles, and similar evidence).
- Then, a holistic evaluation is performed, weighing whether all that evidence, taken together, truly demonstrates excellence and distinction in the field.
The practical value is separating the mere counting of items from qualitative analysis: gathering many documents is not enough if the overall record does not support a finding of genuine prominence. This is why the framework helps both those preparing the petition and those reviewing it to identify strengths and gaps.
It is worth noting that the final decision rests with the USCIS, which examines each case according to its own criteria. For an accurate reading of your profile, consult the updated guidance on the official source or speak with a specialist.
Learn more about EB-1
- Category
- EB-1 Green Card (1st priority)
- Requirement
- Extraordinary ability
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- Processing
- 6-18 months
Tags
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.