The USCIS found that a blog that interviewed me is not major. Do I lose the ‘media coverage’ criterion?

Not necessarily. If the USCIS determined that the blog is not a high-profile outlet, that specific interview may not sustain the media coverage criterion on its own, but that does not mean losing the criterion altogether. Media coverage is assessed based on the full body of evidence you present, not on a single piece.

What the USCIS typically weighs is the relevance and reach of the outlet. To strengthen this front, review the rest of your materials:

• Are there articles in outlets with broader circulation and reputation?
• Does the coverage speak specifically about your work, rather than merely mentioning you in passing?
• Can you show the outlet’s authorship, publication date, and readership reach?

A discarded piece can be offset by stronger ones, and the media criterion may still be met by the overall record. It is also worth remembering that media coverage is just one of several types of evidence for EB-1. Since each case is reviewed individually, the best path is to confirm updated requirements at USCIS and revisit your evidence strategy with a specialist.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.