Is publishing on arXiv considered peer-reviewed for the EB-1?

No. Publishing on arXiv is not the same as having a peer-reviewed work. arXiv is a repository widely used in the scientific community to share research quickly, but submissions go through only basic moderation, which checks whether the content is scientific in nature, rather than a rigorous, expert-level evaluation.

This distinction matters for the EB-1. Peer review, as practiced by indexed journals, serves as an independent validation of the quality and rigor of a study. For this reason, publications that have gone through that process tend to carry more weight when the goal is to demonstrate recognition and meaningful contribution to a field.

That said, being on arXiv is not without value. A preprint can:

• Establish authorship and the date of a research finding.
• Help demonstrate ongoing productivity and dissemination of your work.
• Serve as a complement to articles later published through formal peer review.

The ideal approach is to present arXiv preprints as part of a broader body of evidence, making the status of each publication clear. Since every case is evaluated individually, it is worth checking the current USCIS criteria and seeking expert guidance.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.