In EB-1B, are 2 out of 6 criteria enough?

It is important to begin by highlighting that EB-1 visas are intended for professionals who excel in their fields and that, both in EB-1A and EB-1B, the analysis performed by the immigration service (USCIS) is quite holistic.

In the specific case of EB-1B, aimed at professors and researchers considered ‘outstanding’, there are requirements that go beyond simply checking a fixed number of criteria. Many believe that by satisfying only two of the six types of suggested evidence (such as important awards, publications, participation as a peer reviewer in the field, among others), the application automatically becomes eligible, but this interpretation can be misleading.

In reality, although the USCIS guide for EB-1B mentions that demonstrating two types of evidence may, in theory, be sufficient, what really matters is the strength and relevance of the documentation presented. In other words, it is not a ‘checklist’ where simply marking two items guarantees approval. Each case is evaluated considering the total set of evidence and how they demonstrate the international relevance of the candidate’s work.

For example, if the publications or original contributions presented have significant impact and are widely recognized by the academic or scientific community, this can weigh more than mere membership in an association or occasional participation as a reviewer.

Thus, the decision is made based on the ‘totality’ of the candidate’s profile. Therefore, it is emphasized the importance of strictly following the United States immigration laws and regulations. Before starting any process, it is wise to seek detailed information and consider guidance from specialized sources, always avoiding miracle solutions or unfounded promises of easy results.

This caution helps reduce the risk of future complications and ensures that the documentation complies with the standards required by USCIS.

In summary, although the EB-1B guide mentions the possibility of meeting two criteria, this should not be understood as a simplistic rule. The analysis is very detailed and requires convincing evidence that, together, demonstrate the excellence and impact of the professor’s or researcher’s work.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.