This type of RFE in an EB-1 case typically means one thing: the officer reviewed your publication portfolio but found no clear evidence that your work was recognized or influenced your field. Your response must therefore focus on demonstrating impact, not merely the existence of your publications.
The strategy is to gather additional proof that shows real-world reach: that other professionals cited, referenced, or built upon your work as a foundation for advances in the field.
- Excerpts from recognized databases such as Google Scholar, Scopus, or Web of Science showing citation counts for your work.
- Letters from experts attesting to the influence of your publications within the community.
- Concrete examples of how your work was applied or served as a reference for others.
Every case is unique, and the best response to an RFE addresses exactly what the officer identified as missing. A specialist can help you determine which pieces of evidence best close that gap. Always confirm the specific requirements of your case with the official source.
Learn more about EB-1
- Category
- EB-1 Green Card (1st priority)
- Requirement
- Extraordinary ability
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- Processing
- 6-18 months
Tags
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.