I have 2 evaluation panels and 1 regional award. There are missing evidences for 3 criteria, right?

The process of obtaining an EB-1 visa requires demonstrating extraordinary achievements or international recognition in your field of work, which involves meeting specific criteria required by the USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services).

Generally, for the extraordinary ability category (EB-1A), it is necessary to present robust evidence that meets at least three of the ten established criteria, except in cases where there is a unique and highly relevant international award.

In your case, you mentioned having two evaluation panels and one regional award. It is important to emphasize that each piece of evidence needs to be assessed according to the specific criteria, and not all documents necessarily fit the same way. In some cases, evaluation panels can be interpreted as a form of recognition by experts in the field, but it is essential to analyze whether these panels meet the required parameters in terms of relevance, impact, and national or international recognition.

As for the regional award, although it is a valuable achievement, its strength may be limited compared to, for example, an international award.

Therefore, the conclusion that there may be missing evidence for three criteria can be valid, but it depends on the interpretation of each element according to USCIS requirements.

It is advisable to carefully review the available documentation and, if necessary, seek additional proof that strengthens other criteria, such as high-impact publications, participation as a judge in works of other recognized professionals in the area, consistent citations in relevant publications, or other accomplishments that demonstrate your extraordinary ability.

Always remember the importance of strictly following the laws and immigration guidelines of the United States. It is wise to have the support of specialized professionals and avoid proposals that promise guaranteed results or that are not in compliance with legal procedures, to minimize the risk of mistakes that may compromise your application.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and aims to help better understand the EB-1 criteria. Each case has its particularities, and the interpretation of the evidence may vary depending on the context.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.