I am a statistician who created a method adopted by health ministries. Does it qualify as ‘major significance’?

Having created a method adopted by health ministries is exactly the type of achievement that can point to ‘major significance’ in an EB-1 petition. That expression describes a contribution of substantial relevance, one capable of influencing practice in your field beyond a single project or institution.

The central point is demonstrating impact. Simply stating that the method exists is not enough; you need to show how it was incorporated, what decisions or protocols it changed, and what benefit it brought. Adoption by government agencies is a strong signal, especially when accompanied by recognition from experts and institutions.

Several types of evidence can help support that impact:

• Official documents showing the adoption of the method.
• Publications, references, or citations of your work by third parties.
• Letters from authorities and experts explaining its relevance.
• Evidence that its use has spread beyond its point of origin.

If the influence is real and well documented, there is good potential for a strong framing. Since the analysis is done on a case-by-case basis, it is worth checking the updated criteria at USCIS and reviewing your presentation with a specialist.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.