Generally, yes. In EB-1A, awards and recognitions form a single evidence category, so two minor international awards tend to reinforce that one type of criterion rather than adding up as if they were separate criteria. They strengthen one front of your case, not two.
That does not mean they are irrelevant. What the analysis looks at is the combined weight of those awards: the prestige of each one, their international reach, the selection criteria, and the impact they had in your field. Two minor awards that are well contextualized can, taken together, help build a convincing picture of recognition, as long as you explain why they matter in your area.
The strongest strategy is not to rely on a single category alone. EB-1A is typically built by demonstrating distinction across multiple fronts of evidence, such as publications, service as a peer reviewer, relevant original contributions, or coverage in specialized press. That way, the awards become one piece within a broader set.
- Awards count within one evidence category, not as separate criteria.
- What matters is their combined prestige and reach, well contextualized.
- Diversifying your evidence fronts strengthens the case more than accumulating similar awards.
Since each case is evaluated individually, it is worth checking the updated requirements from the official source (USCIS) and building your evidence strategy with a specialist before filing.
Learn more about EB-1
- Category
- EB-1 Green Card (1st priority)
- Requirement
- Extraordinary ability
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- Processing
- 6-18 months
Tags
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.