For EB-1A, do I need to have reviewed other people’s articles?

No, serving as a peer reviewer for third-party articles is not a mandatory requirement of the EB-1A. It is simply one of many pieces of evidence that can strengthen your case, not a formal criterion for eligibility.

The EB-1A is the green card pathway for those who demonstrate extraordinary ability in their field. Reviewing other researchers’ work carries weight because it signals that the professional community recognizes your authority on the subject. But it is just one avenue: awards, publications, original contributions, and prominent participation in international events serve the same purpose.

In other words, the absence of this specific experience does not close any doors, as long as your petition includes other solid evidence of recognition. What matters is the overall picture built from the evidence that best fits your profile.

Since each case is assessed individually, it is worth carefully planning your portfolio and reviewing the updated criteria with USCIS, ideally with the guidance of an immigration specialist.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.