Does evaluating research proposals at the invitation of a scientific committee count as ‘judge’ for the EB-1?

Yes, in the EB-1 category, evaluating the work of other professionals at the invitation of a scientific committee can qualify as a judging activity (judge). What defines this criterion is the critical review of peers’ contributions within your area of expertise, and reviewing research proposals fits that role.

For the activity to strengthen your case, the invitation must be well documented and demonstrate that you held a meaningful evaluative role in your field, not merely a one-time, low-significance participation.

• The formal invitation and the criteria by which you were selected.
• The nature of the evaluation and exactly what you reviewed.
• The importance and reach of the committee in your field.

The clearer the recognition behind the invitation, the stronger the evidence. Each case is assessed individually, so confirm the current requirements with the official source (USCIS) or with a specialist before filing.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.