Visto n' Visa
Blog
Notícias e artigos
Destinations
Careers
Immigrants

What are the main mistakes that can lead to the issuance of an RFE regarding Academic Evaluation?

Main errors in the EB-2 NIW academic evaluation include incomplete documents, unrecognized evaluations, translation mistakes, and poor organization, which can lead to an RFE.

Written by

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Updated on January 24, 2025
2 min read
Share

The EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) visa is an excellent opportunity for professionals seeking to demonstrate extraordinary abilities and contribute significantly to the United States. However, one of the challenges in this process is the academic evaluation, and small mistakes at this stage can result in the issuance of an RFE (Request for Evidence).

Among the main errors is the submission of incomplete or poorly organized documents. It is essential that the entire academic history be properly documented, including diplomas, certificates, transcripts, and, when necessary, sworn translations. The absence of information or materials that corroborate the candidate’s credentials can hinder the understanding of the equivalence of their degrees and qualifications.

Another key point is not presenting an academic evaluation performed by a recognized institution. The body responsible for the evaluation must have experience and credibility in the market. If the analysis is considered insufficient or questionable, USCIS may request additional evidence to confirm the validity and relevance of the studies presented. Thus, it is vital that the chosen expert has expertise in the United States educational system and follows the required criteria.

Additionally, errors in translation or in the comparison of qualifications can raise doubts about the equivalency of diplomas with American standards. Details such as course hours, course content, and the reputation of foreign institutions are thoroughly analyzed, and any discrepancies may generate the need to supplement the documentation.

Finally, the formatting and organization of the documents must also be carefully reviewed. Presenting information clearly and logically is crucial to facilitate the analysis by the consulate or immigration agency. Each item must be presented in a way that the evaluator can understand the educational background and the relevance of the candidate’s qualifications.

It is important to emphasize that strictly following United States immigration laws and guidelines is fundamental in this process. Always seek reliable sources and avoid offers promising miraculous or guaranteed results. Seeking guidance from specialized professionals with extensive experience in the subject can make all the difference in preparing the documents and conducting the process, ensuring that all requirements are met appropriately and consistently.

Each case is unique and requires a detailed analysis, considering all aspects involved in the academic evaluation. Therefore, paying attention to these details is essential to avoid inconveniences and build a solid and convincing petition.

Learn more about EB-2 NIW

Category
EB-2 NIW Green Card
Self-petition
Allowed (no sponsor needed)
PERM
Waived
Processing
12-36 months
All about EB-2 NIW
Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.

Victoria's tips

What are the main mistakes that can lead to the issuance of an RFE regarding Academic Evaluation?

Main errors in the EB-2 NIW academic evaluation include incomplete documents, unrecognized evaluations, translation mistakes, and poor organization, which can lead to an RFE.

Recommended reading about EB-2 NIW

More content about EB-2 NIW