What are the main elements to include in a response to an RFE regarding indirect costs?

Responding to an RFE (Request for Evidence) involving indirect cost issues can seem challenging, especially for those unfamiliar with the EB-2 NIW visa procedures. However, structuring the response well and presenting robust documentation can make all the difference in the success of the process. Below are some essential points to include, always keeping in mind the importance of complying with United States immigration laws, seeking guidance from specialized professionals, and exercising caution regarding offers that promise miraculous results.

First, it is fundamental to provide a detailed explanation of the methodology used to calculate the indirect costs. This involves describing how these costs were allocated and justifying the allocation basis adopted. Include, for example, which percentages or calculation indices were applied to the total expenses and how this methodology relates to the activities and operations that benefit the project. By showing this relationship, it becomes evident that the indirect costs are not arbitrary but rather based on accepted accounting and administrative practices.

Furthermore, it is crucial to attach supporting documentation that proves these expenses. This may include budget spreadsheets, invoices, payment receipts, and detailed financial reports. By attaching this documentation, you demonstrate transparency and rigor in managing the resources used. It is also recommended to include a timeline or schedule correlating the indirect costs with the project phases, reinforcing the narrative that such expenses are essential for carrying out the activities consistent with the EB-2 NIW scope.

Another important aspect is to explain how the indirect costs contribute to the viability and overall impact of the project. In the case of EB-2 NIW, it is essential to demonstrate that the work to be performed has relevance and benefit for the national interest. Thus, associate the indirect costs with infrastructures, equipment, and administrative supports that enable the effective execution of the research or initiative. This correlation helps strengthen the need for these costs to be recognized and approved as an integral part of the project.

Finally, remain attentive to the current guidelines and rules of the United States immigration system. Ensure that all elements and documentation comply with USCIS requirements to avoid further inquiries. Consulting reliable sources and specialized professionals can prevent complications or misunderstandings, as well as ensure you do not fall into traps of marketing campaigns that promise results without legal or documentary basis.

In summary, the response to an RFE regarding indirect costs must be clear, detailed, and well documented, reflecting a transparent calculation methodology, justified costs in relation to the project objectives, and proof through documents of the authenticity of the information presented. Always seek guidance based on the norms of the United States immigration system, avoiding shortcuts that could compromise the progress of the process.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.