Yes. In the EB-2 NIW, demonstrating participation in scientific committees is generally useful, as it signals that your peers recognize your expertise and trust your judgment to evaluate and guide work in the field.
This type of involvement helps build the picture of a professional with a prominent position and influence in their field, which aligns directly with the logic of the visa: showing that your contribution is relevant and recognized.
Even so, it cannot support a case on its own. Ideally, committee participation should appear as one piece within a broader set of evidence, such as:
- Relevant publications and citations in the field.
- Awards and recognition for contributions.
- Notable research or applied projects.
- Recommendation letters from experts.
Each case is evaluated individually, so it is worth integrating this evidence into a coherent strategy and, if possible, reviewing the file with a specialist. Check for updated guidance at the official source (USCIS).
Learn more about EB-2 NIW
- Category
- EB-2 NIW Green Card
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- PERM
- Waived
- Processing
- 12-36 months
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.