How to respond to an RFE questioning your work’s contribution to the national interest in EB-2 NIW?

In the EB-2 NIW, it helps to correct the premise: an RFE (Request for Evidence) does not ask for a cost-versus-benefit analysis, and the program is not an investment pathway. What the adjudicator wants to understand is whether your work has merit and national importance for the United States.

For that reason, the strongest response connects your professional contributions to concrete impacts, backed by evidence, rather than justifying expenses:

• Results and achievements that demonstrate the reach of your work.
• How your contribution benefits the economy, innovation, or social areas.
• Expert letters and supporting documents that establish that relevance.

Clearly explain the link between what you do and the benefit to the country, honestly and without promising outcomes. Since each case is evaluated individually, it is worth reviewing the updated guidance from USCIS or consulting with a specialist.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.