How to respond to an RFE questioning the validity of Academic Evaluation documents?

When the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issues a Request for Evidence (RFE) questioning the validity of academic evaluation documents, it is crucial to respond in an organized, clear, and well-founded manner.

This type of evaluation is an essential component of the EB-2 NIW visa petition, as it demonstrates the equivalence and relevance of your diplomas and professional qualifications against U.S. standards.

First, carefully review the RFE to understand exactly what doubts and points the USCIS is contesting. Then, gather additional documentation that proves the legitimacy of the original academic evaluation documents. This may include accreditation letters from the institution that conducted the evaluation, detailed explanations about the methodology used, references to international diploma equivalency standards, and, if possible, an additional statement from the evaluator or agency confirming the validity of the process. Make sure that all documents are translated into English by a certified translator, if necessary.

It is also important to prepare a well-structured response letter, in which you organize the points questioned by the USCIS, reference the attached documentation, and clearly and objectively explain how the original documents meet the criteria required by law. Emphasize compliance with U.S. immigration regulations and demonstrate that all procedures adopted are in accordance with the best international practices in academic evaluations.

We reinforce the importance of strictly following U.S. immigration laws and considering consultation with specialized professionals, even if only informatively, to ensure that the documents and arguments presented meet the required criteria; however, one should avoid falling for scams or marketing campaigns promising guaranteed results. Transparency and consistency in documentation will be the greatest allies in resolving the RFE.

In short, a well-crafted response to an RFE questioning the validity of academic evaluation documents should include: a detailed explanation of each controversial point, supporting documentation that proves the legitimacy of the endorsements, and strict observance of the formal procedures provided by USCIS. In this way, you demonstrate commitment to legal requirements, which can increase the analysts’ confidence in the truthfulness of the information presented.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.