How to respond to an RFE questioning the relationship between costs and national benefits?

The EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) visa is intended for professionals who wish to demonstrate that their work is relevant to the national interests of the United States, thereby waiving the need for a job offer and labor certification. Therefore, in many cases it is essential for the petitioner to show how the benefits of their proposal or work outweigh the potential costs to the nation.

When responding to an RFE (Request for Evidence) that questions the relationship between national costs and benefits, it is important to structure your response clearly and with proper documentation. Initially, it is recommended to present a comprehensive overview of the proposal or project, emphasizing the expected outcomes and its impact on specific sectors such as health, technology, economy, environment, or education.

Next, detail how the investments or resources involved in your initiative will not only pay off but will also provide substantial gains for US society and the economy. For example, if your research can lead to a technological innovation or significant improvements in industrial processes, include data, studies, and testimonials that demonstrate the benefits in the medium and long term.

Another crucial point is to compare the initial costs with the aggregated benefits in a balanced manner. If there are measurable costs, demonstrate with numbers and qualitative analyses that the expected return, from the perspective of the national interest, is significantly higher. Try to include references from experts or academic publications that support your arguments, showing that your proposal has been positively evaluated by other professionals in the field.

It is important to remember that the US immigration process requires strict compliance with current laws and regulations. Therefore, always ensure honesty and transparency in your response, and avoid using dubious information or campaigns promising miraculous results without legal backing. Seeking advice from specialized professionals can help present the best possible documentation, but it is essential to guarantee that any assistance received complies with immigration laws.

In summary, an effective response to an RFE questioning the relationship between costs and national benefits should clearly and objectively present the positive impact your proposal will have for the US, supported by data, analyses, and consistent references. In this way, it is demonstrated that the investments involved will be more than compensated by the benefits generated for the national interest.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.