How to respond to an RFE questioning the originality of your contributions?

In the EB-2 NIW, when an RFE questions the originality of your contributions, your response must demonstrate, objectively, what is new about your work and why it advances your field rather than simply repeating prior efforts.

The starting point is gathering evidence that supports that originality. Articles in prominent journals, patents, awards, and letters from experts who clearly explain how your work differs from what already existed tend to be helpful.

Beyond listing documents, it is worth explaining the reasoning. Describe the method you used, the result you achieved, and how it represents an advance or a novel approach, linking that distinction to the benefits it can generate for the United States.

Organize everything coherently, connecting each piece of evidence to the specific point raised in the RFE, to facilitate the officer’s review. Respect the stated deadline, be skeptical of promises of guaranteed outcomes, and confirm updated guidance at USCIS, relying on reputable professionals.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.