Visto n' Visa
Blog
Notícias e artigos
Destinations
Careers
Immigrants

How to respond to an RFE questioning the originality of your academic contributions?

Respond with clear and structured evidence to prove the originality of your academic contributions in processes such as the EB-2 NIW, respecting immigration laws.

Written by

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Updated on February 25, 2025
2 min read
Share

When you receive an RFE (Request for Evidence) questioning the originality of your academic contributions, it is essential to respond in a structured, detailed manner with clear evidence. This type of request is common in processes such as the EB-2 NIW, where the authenticity and relevance of your contributions are crucial to prove the impact of your work.

To prepare a robust response, start by organizing all documentation that proves the originality and importance of your academic achievements. This may include publications, citations from other works, patents, recommendation letters, and independent evaluations from experts in your field demonstrating that your studies or projects present novel approaches and results.

Explain in detail how each piece of documentation relates to the visa criteria, highlighting the impact your work has had on the academic or technological community. Additionally, it is essential to write a clear and concise personal statement summarizing the development of your contributions, describing the context, challenges faced, and the innovation that your research or projects represent.

If there are discrepancies or doubts regarding originality, seek to include peer reviews or expert assessments that can attest to the relevance and uniqueness of your work. This narrative, when accompanied by evidence, strengthens your argument regarding the visa criteria.

Remember the importance of strictly following United States immigration laws and guidelines. Every document submitted must be accurate and, if necessary, accompanied by certified translations. Also, seek guidance from immigration professionals to ensure your response complies with USCIS expectations, avoiding risks and future complications.

It is always recommended to have a thorough review of the response to ensure all raised doubts have been properly clarified. Finally, be cautious of consultancy offers and marketing campaigns that promise guaranteed results. The immigration process involves formal procedures and is governed by specific laws, which makes it essential to provide solid evidence and arguments when responding to an RFE.

By organizing your response with clarity and transparency, you facilitate the evaluator’s understanding and increase the chances of a positive analysis regarding the originality of your academic contributions.

Learn more about EB-2 NIW

Category
EB-2 NIW Green Card
Self-petition
Allowed (no sponsor needed)
PERM
Waived
Processing
12-36 months
All about EB-2 NIW
Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.

Victoria's tips

How to respond to an RFE questioning the originality of your academic contributions?

Respond with clear and structured evidence to prove the originality of your academic contributions in processes such as the EB-2 NIW, respecting immigration laws.

Recommended reading about EB-2 NIW

More content about EB-2 NIW

New USCIS Premium Processing Rates in 2026 E-2
Victoria Harper Victoria Harper

New USCIS Premium Processing Fees in 2026

USCIS has updated the premium processing fees starting from March 2026. Check out the new amounts for forms I-129, I-140,…