How to respond to an RFE questioning the consistency among the submitted evidence?

When the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issues an RFE (Request for Evidence) requesting clarifications about the consistency of the evidence submitted in an EB-2 NIW case, it is crucial to respond in a detailed, organized, and transparent manner – always respecting the United States immigration laws.

First, it is important to carefully review the entire package of evidence sent and precisely identify which points were questioned in the RFE. In your response, you must demonstrate that you understand these doubts by clearly explaining how and why the documents presented complement each other and form a consistent set.

This may involve reorganizing information, including narratives that explain the timeline of events, or even presenting new documents that reinforce the consistency among the evidence. Furthermore, it is recommended to prepare a structured and objective response letter to submit along with the complementary documents.

In this letter, include a brief introduction contextualizing your case, followed by a point-by-point explanation addressing each inquiry raised by the USCIS. Detailing how each piece of evidence contributes to demonstrating the merit of your petition can help clarify any possible doubts about the coherence and consistency of the materials previously submitted.

It is essential to follow the guidelines established by United States immigration laws and act with transparency and accuracy when presenting the new documents and explanations. It is also wise to seek guidance from specialists and use specialized immigration services to avoid pitfalls and far-fetched solutions, often promoted by marketing campaigns promising quick and guaranteed results.

Proper resolution of an RFE requires attention to detail and strict compliance with the deadlines imposed by the USCIS. In summary, to respond to an RFE questioning the consistency among the submitted evidence, I seek to reorganize and properly document the information in a clear letter, address point by point each raised doubt, and, if necessary, add robust complementary evidence. In doing so, you strengthen your case, always focusing on clarity, honesty, and compliance with immigration regulations.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.