In the EB-2 NIW, an Academic Evaluation typically serves to show how your credentials compare to U.S. standards. For it to support your case effectively, you need to demonstrate that it was conducted with rigor and impartiality: presenting the result alone is not enough.
A few elements help establish that credibility:
- Choosing a recognized and credentialed evaluator, for example one affiliated with industry associations such as NACES or AICE.
- Submitting a report that describes the methodology used and how credit equivalencies were determined.
- Including the qualifications of the specialists who conducted the analysis.
If there is any doubt about an evaluator’s background, seeking references and comparing options strengthens the reliability of the report. A transparent evaluation not only supports recognition of your credentials, but also reflects a professional posture before the authority.
Be cautious of services that promise guaranteed outcomes. Because standards can change, it is worth checking the updated guidance on the USCIS website and, when in doubt, seeking specialized support.
Learn more about EB-2 NIW
- Category
- EB-2 NIW Green Card
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- PERM
- Waived
- Processing
- 12-36 months
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.