It can. In the EB-1, awards serve as evidence of genuine recognition in a field, and USCIS evaluates whether a given distinction reflects real merit. An award that appears to have been purchased or manufactured tends to weaken a case rather than strengthen it, because it casts doubt on the authenticity of the entire body of evidence.
The central issue is credibility. A distinction recognized by peers carries weight precisely because it is competitive and merit-based. Signs that an award may lack that standing include:
- Recognitions that require payment to be received, with no real selection criteria.
- Granting entities with no track record, independence, or reputation in the field.
- Absence of an evaluation process, jury, or competition.
More serious than a weak award is the perception of an attempt to deceive: presenting artificial evidence as genuine can jeopardize the entire petition and create difficulties in future proceedings. The safe path is to prioritize authentic and verifiable recognitions. Since each case is reviewed individually by USCIS, it is worth checking the updated guidelines at the official source and reviewing the file with a specialist.
Learn more about EB-1
- Category
- EB-1 Green Card (1st priority)
- Requirement
- Extraordinary ability
- Self-petition
- Allowed (no sponsor needed)
- Processing
- 6-18 months
Tags
About the author
Victoria Harper
Editor-in-Chief
As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.