Is it normal to cite scores from journal ranking websites (SJR, JCR)?

The immigration process in the United States, especially in categories such as the EB-1 visa, involves presenting strong evidence regarding the candidate’s professional and academic achievements. In this context, it is common for individuals working in scientific or academic fields to use impact metrics, such as scores provided by journal ranking websites (SJR, JCR), to demonstrate the recognition and relevance of their publications.

These indexes, which indicate the quality and prestige of the journals in which the works were published, can be useful as part of the set of evidence presented in an EB-1 petition. However, it is important to remember that United States immigration officers evaluate the case holistically, considering various factors beyond the numbers or publication metrics.

Including these data can strengthen the argument if they are contextualized within the candidate’s entire professional trajectory. It is always worth emphasizing the importance of strictly following the current immigration laws. It is advisable to seek guidance from specialized professionals and exercise caution when considering information disseminated by marketing campaigns or promises of miraculous results.

This care helps prevent possible scams and avoids efforts based on incomplete or inadequate information. Each case is unique and documentation must be presented consistently with the required criteria. Careful preparation and proper follow-up can make a difference in the overall evaluation of the immigration process, ensuring that all evidence aligns with legal requirements and the candidate’s professional history.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.