I served as an ad hoc reviewer for 2 regional conferences: does that lack relevance for the EB-1?

Serving as an ad hoc reviewer for two regional conferences is not irrelevant to the EB-1. Evaluating the work of other professionals shows that your field recognizes your technical ability, and this role as a peer evaluator is precisely one of the types of evidence the category values.

The key point is that, on its own, this experience tends to be read as modest, especially when the events have regional reach. It gains relevance when it appears as part of a broader picture of your recognition, alongside elements such as:

• Publications and citations of your work.
• Awards or distinctions in your field.
• Participation in committees or panels at higher-profile institutions.
• Other evidence of influence and leadership in your sector.

For the EB-1 extraordinary ability category, USCIS reviews the applicant’s complete profile rather than any single activity in isolation. A multifaceted approach that combines different types of evidence is therefore generally more persuasive than relying on one item alone.

Make the most of this experience as part of your overall package and confirm the current requirements with the official source (USCIS) or an immigration specialist before filing.

About the author

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

As a journalist and lead editor at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps ensure that immigration topics are covered in a clear, trustworthy, and easy-to-understand way. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.