I applied for EB-1 without awards, but with 3 criteria. Is it valid?

The EB-1 visa, especially in the extraordinary ability category (EB-1A), requires the applicant to prove their professional excellence through robust evidence. Generally, the process requires meeting at least three of the criteria established by the immigration service, as long as these elements provide convincing evidence of exceptional ability.

In your case, stating that you ‘took a risk without awards but with 3 criteria’ can be a valid strategy, provided that the criteria presented meet the required standards and are strong enough to demonstrate your extraordinary ability. This means that the documentation must be thorough and demonstrate, for example, significant contributions to the field, publications, participation in expert panels, or any other relevant criteria that the evaluating authority considers proof of excellence.

It is always important to remember that each case is unique and the analysis is conducted holistically by USCIS. Therefore, the quality and consistency of the evidence are fundamental. Maintaining compliance with the United States immigration laws and regulations is essential at all stages of the process.

Caution is recommended when following information from unofficial sources and seeking specialized guidance to avoid falling into misleading promises or marketing campaigns that guarantee results. Therefore, although the strategy of presenting three criteria without awards may be accepted, the key lies in how these criteria are demonstrated and in the robustness of the documentation presented. Transparency and clarity in evidencing professional achievements are crucial for the positive evaluation of the petition.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.