Visto n' Visa
Blog
Notícias e artigos
Destinations
Careers
Immigrants

I am a statistician who created a method adopted by ministries of health. Does ‘major significance’ apply?

Statistical method adopted by ministries of health can have 'major significance' for EB-1, provided its relevance and significant impact are proven.

Written by

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Updated on June 22, 2025
2 min read
Share

When considering the EB-1, it is important to understand that this visa category is aimed at professionals who have achieved extraordinary accomplishments in their fields and whose contributions have a striking impact.

Among the evaluated criteria, the demonstration of ‘major significance’ refers to the relevance and substantial influence that an achievement, invention, or method can have at the national or international level. In the case of a statistician who developed a method adopted by ministries of health, this fact can indeed be considered as evidence of a contribution of great relevance – or ‘major significance’.

This evaluation will depend on how your method transformed or improved public health practices. For example, relevant factors include the degree of innovation of the method, the positive change it promotes in health policies or protocols, and the repercussions that extended beyond its original environment, reaching recognition among experts and international institutions.

It is crucial to gather and present evidence that proves this significant influence. Certificates, publications, letters of recommendation from recognized experts in the field, and documentation of recognition by health authorities can strengthen your case. These elements demonstrate that the method is not only innovative but also exerts considerable impact on the function and practice of ministries of health.

Always remembering that the immigration process in the United States follows strict rules, it is essential to pay attention to legal regulations and seek support from reliable sources. Beware of promises of easy results and campaigns that guarantee approval without providing proper technical and legal support.

This informative analysis does not replace consulting a qualified specialist who can offer a complete and personalized assessment of your case.

In summary, if your method truly influenced health practices and obtained official and academic recognition, there is a good possibility of it being considered a contribution of ‘major significance’. However, the success of the process will depend on how you organize and present all the documentation proving this relevance to the competent authorities.

Learn more about EB-1 Visa

Category
EB-1 Green Card (1st priority)
Requirement
Extraordinary ability
Self-petition
Allowed (no sponsor needed)
Processing
6-18 months
All about EB-1 Visa
Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.

Victoria's tips

I am a statistician who created a method adopted by ministries of health. Does ‘major significance’ apply?

Statistical method adopted by ministries of health can have 'major significance' for EB-1, provided its relevance and significant impact are proven.

Recommended reading about EB-1

More content about EB-1