A scientific committee invited me to review research proposals. Is this considered judging?

U.S. immigration, especially in the context of visas classified as EB-1, evaluates professional activities and achievements to verify whether the applicant stands out in their field. One of the criteria that may be considered is that of “judging” – in the sense of having served in the evaluation of works or contributions by other professionals.

In your case, the fact that a scientific committee invited you to review research proposals can indeed be seen as a judging activity, provided that the role involves the critical analysis and evaluation of works in your area of expertise.

For this activity to be considered favorable in an EB-1 petition, it is advisable that you prove, through documentation, the relevance of the invitation, the selection criteria, as well as the importance of the committee in the scientific or professional scenario.

It is essential to gather evidence demonstrating that your performance in this role has impact and international recognition or relevance at a high level within the field.

Remember that each case is analyzed individually, and documents that prove the uniqueness and relevance of your contribution are essential to strengthen your process.

Finally, I stress the importance of strictly following U.S. immigration laws and seeking assistance from professionals specialized in the area. This way, you can avoid traps and unfounded promises of easy results, ensuring that all necessary documentation and evidence are prepared correctly and efficiently.

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.