Visto n' Visa
Blog
Notícias e artigos
Destinations
Careers
Immigrants

How to respond to an RFE questioning the validity of Academic Evaluation documents?

Respond to the RFE with validated documents, a clear method, and proof of the evaluating authority, demonstrating strict compliance with USCIS regulations.

Written by

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Updated on March 25, 2025
2 min read
Share

Upon receiving an RFE (Request for Evidence) questioning the validity of the Academic Evaluation documents, the first step is to carefully read the notice and precisely identify which aspects of the documents are being challenged. Generally, USCIS seeks assurances that the academic evaluations were conducted by recognized experts, so it is essential to demonstrate that these documents meet the required standards.

This situation may arise, for example, if there are doubts regarding the methodology used or the credentials of the institution that issued the evaluation. An effective approach is to organize a clear and meticulous response. In the body of the reply, describe in detail the evaluation process used, highlight the qualifications of the entity issuing the Academic Evaluation, and present any additional evidence supporting the validity of the documents. This may include copies of certificates, credentials of the evaluating company, detailed descriptions of the criteria and methodologies employed, and, if possible, an official letter from the entity confirming the authenticity and international acceptance of the evaluation.

If additional documentation or corroborating evaluations exist that reinforce the credibility of the documents, include this evidence as part of the response. Moreover, it is important to emphasize your commitment to compliance with United States immigration laws. When composing the response, stress that all required conditions and procedures were rigorously followed, demonstrating transparency and adherence to the regulations. This stance not only strengthens your case but also demonstrates the seriousness with which the process is being handled.

Finally, remember that the response to an RFE must be made very carefully and within the deadline stipulated by USCIS. If there is any doubt about the best way to formulate the response, consulting specialized professionals can be a prudent choice. However, it is crucial to avoid any offers promising guaranteed results or dubious practices, as faithful compliance with the rules and the presentation of well-organized evidence are the safest paths to success in the process.

Learn more about EB-2 NIW

Category
EB-2 NIW Green Card
Self-petition
Allowed (no sponsor needed)
PERM
Waived
Processing
12-36 months
All about EB-2 NIW
Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.

Victoria's tips

How to respond to an RFE questioning the validity of Academic Evaluation documents?

Respond to the RFE with validated documents, a clear method, and proof of the evaluating authority, demonstrating strict compliance with USCIS regulations.

Recommended reading about EB-2 NIW

More content about EB-2 NIW