Visto n' Visa
Blog
Notícias e artigos
Destinations
Careers
Immigrants

How to respond to an RFE questioning the originality of your academic contributions?

To respond to an RFE on academic originality, gather robust evidence, clearly explain your innovations, and follow the legislation, ensuring organization and clarity in the documentation.

Written by

Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Updated on July 7, 2025
2 min read
Share

When we receive an RFE (Request for Evidence) questioning the originality of your academic contributions, the first step is to understand that this type of request is part of the evaluation process by USCIS, which aims to certify that each case meets the criteria required by the EB‑2 NIW visa. In other words, the agency wants to be sure that your achievements truly stand out and bring significant benefits to the United States.

To respond to this type of RFE, it is essential to gather robust and well-organized documentation proving your original contributions. This may include scientific publications, citations, letters of recommendation from recognized experts in the field, patents, awards, invitations to lectures, and other materials demonstrating the influence and impact of your work.

When preparing these documents, detail the context in which your ideas were developed and clearly explain how they differ from similar works. Another strategy is to draft a detailed statement, explaining clearly and objectively the originality of your achievements. In this document, you can point out the challenges faced in the field, the innovations you introduced, and the benefits your discoveries provided to the academic community and, by extension, the United States.

Emphasize that each piece of evidence presented demonstrates not only originality but also recognition by peers and the community at large. Remember the importance of following United States immigration laws and seeking specialized guidance during this process. It is recommended to work with trustworthy and recognized professionals or companies, avoiding promises of miraculous results or marketing campaigns that guarantee approval, as each case has its specificities and can only be evaluated based on real evidence and current legislation.

Finally, maintain clarity and organization of your documents in the response to the RFE, ensuring that all information presented complies with USCIS requirements. This attention to detail can be decisive in assessing the originality of your academic contributions and securing recognition of your potential for national benefit.

Learn more about EB-2 NIW

Category
EB-2 NIW Green Card
Self-petition
Allowed (no sponsor needed)
PERM
Waived
Processing
12-36 months
All about EB-2 NIW
Victoria Harper

Editor-in-Chief

Meet the author

Leading journalism and editorial content at Visto n’ Visa, Victoria helps make immigration topics clear, trustworthy, and easy to understand. Her focus is on delivering useful, human, and relevant content for people exploring new paths abroad.

Victoria's tips

How to respond to an RFE questioning the originality of your academic contributions?

To respond to an RFE on academic originality, gather robust evidence, clearly explain your innovations, and follow the legislation, ensuring organization and clarity in the documentation.

Recommended reading about EB-2 NIW

More content about EB-2 NIW